To most kids, a four-day school week would seem like a dream come true. Who wouldn’t want a longer weekend? That’s one more day to play and procrastinate on homework.
Heck, I could sure go for cutting Friday or Monday out of the work week, even if it would mean putting in more hours on the other four weekdays.
This idea of a shortened school week has been surfacing a lot lately, prompted in particular by the soaring fuel prices that have plagued us this year.
Growing interest
The American Association of School Administrators released a survey this summer that asked superintendents about the effect of rising fuel and energy costs on their school districts.
Not surprisingly, 99 percent of respondents reported that the rising costs were impacting their school systems. Conserving energy, cutting back on field trips and consolidating bus routes were cited as some of the key ways that districts having been dealing with the problem.
Included in the survey was the topic of a shortened school week. While only 3 percent of superintendents said that their districts were scaling back to four days, 15 percent said their districts are considering making that change. Some districts said that they would run offices on a four-day week when school is not in session.
The Associated Press (AP) recently did an article on this subject. The article told of how a small school district in rural Minnesota is cutting classes every Monday to save fuel. Classes on the other four weekdays were extended by about 10 minutes.
The district’s superintendent told the AP that the shorter week would save at least $65,000 in fuel.
Pros and cons
For transportation departments, the potential benefits of moving to a four-day school week are clear:
Cutting mileage also means lowering the chances of bus accidents, although that risk may be small already.
But this strategy is by no means a slam dunk. There are potential drawbacks, including: