If God had meant for women to be in the workplace, He would have given them brains. No, it’s not my joke, and the only reason I mention it here is to make a point. So please don’t flood my office with outraged letters or e-mail or, worse, “even funnier” sexist humor. Is this a funny joke? Certainly not if you’re a woman. But, frankly, it’s the type of humor that people share occasionally. I heard this particular remark during a lunch with three friends, including two women. It wasn’t meant to disparage these women, both of whom are highly regarded and well-respected professionals. But you can’t predict how someone will respond. Nor can you guess how a remark might be modified when repeated, with attribution, by others. A subtle shift of context or emphasis could turn a harmless quip into a slanderous insult.
Watch what you say
That’s why transportation managers — and all employees — must be extremely cautious about what they say in the presence of staff and coworkers, both men and women, whether in the office, at lunch or off the job. In fact, they need to avoid potentially offensive or discriminatory remarks in all of their communication, including e-mail, hard-copy memos and department newsletters. What brings this to light is the recent verdict in the case of four school bus drivers in Lexington, Ky., who successfully sued the district for gender and age bias. These women collected $100,000 in damages after a federal jury determined that a pattern of age and gender discrimination and a hostile work environment existed in the transportation department. During the trial, the women testified that comments made by the transportation director about women drivers as well as older drivers illustrated his biases. According to their lawyer, the drivers complained about the situation and were then harassed and passed over for promotions. The drivers also cited remarks in the department newsletter, “The Yellow Sheet,” that poked fun at women and the elderly. The drivers’ lawyer said the comments were not particularly damning when viewed individually, but created a pattern of harassment when viewed over several issues.










