Q&A: How Does Diesel TCO Compare with Propane?
The Propane Education and Research Council’s Michael Taylor discusses ways in which propane school buses can save transportation providers money beyond just in fuel costs.

Propane buses can save pupil transportation providers on fuel, fluids, and filter costs. Shown here is one of Pasco County (Fla.) Schools' new Blue Bird Propane Vision buses.

With fuel costs still relatively low across the U.S., pupil transportation providers may be wondering whether propane can still provide as much of a cost benefit. Here, the Propane Education and Research Council’s (PERC's) Michael Taylor discusses the ways in which, compared with diesel, propane can save transportation providers money beyond just in fuel costs.
Q: I’ve heard that propane fuel is less expensive than diesel. But how does the total cost of ownership compare with traditional fuels?
A: Fuel savings alone with propane autogas are a big incentive for school districts and private contractors, especially those facing budget cuts. Recently, the U.S. has witnessed a dramatic drop in diesel and gasoline prices; however, propane is still consistently less expensive than both fuels. On average, propane is 30% less expensive per gallon than gasoline and costs 50% less than diesel.
Comparing fuel prices at the pump is a requirement for fleet managers today; however, “fuel” is only one of 3 “Fs” that are having a significant impact on a fleet’s operations, maintenance, and repair budgets.
In compliance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) clean air standards, diesel engines are required to install a complex emissions-after-treatment system, which includes additional fluids and filters. The emissions-reduction system adds complexity as well as increased repair and maintenance costs for diesel buses. Propane burns clean, produces fewer emissions, and requires a simple three-gas catalyst, similar to your personal vehicle, to comply with EPA standards. This is one of many reasons that propane provides the lowest overall total cost of ownership for school districts and private contractors.
“Fluids” are the second “F” that fleet managers must investigate prior to purchasing a vehicle. Unlike propane, diesel engines require more fluids, which have a direct impact on operations and maintenance budgets over the life of the bus. Diesel engines require more oil by volume and SCR engines require diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) for proper operation. And lastly, don’t forget the fuel conditioners that are required in cold temperatures to prevent clogging of fuel filters and lines. Propane engines require less oil by volume and do not require DEF or fuel conditioners, which makes them more affordable to operate and maintain.
The final “F” to investigate is “filters.” To ensure compliance with EPA emissions requirements, a diesel particulate filter (DPF) is required for final stage regeneration of emissions before they exit the exhaust. DPFs require periodic cleanings to avoid clogging. As the system ages, annual cleanings are recommended by the OEM. Why? A clogged DPF will de-rate the engine RPMs and render the bus inoperable. This increases downtime and repair costs.
Even in the presence of disciplined maintenance programs, today’s diesel engines require repairs and replacement parts that propane buses do not. Today’s diesel engines are designed for minimal idling, which should not exceed five minutes. Excessive idling increases diesel emissions regenerations and damages injectors, EGR valves and coolers, turbochargers, and diesel particulate filters. This increases downtime, maintenance, and repair expenses.
If your school district endures sub-freezing temperatures, there’s one more costly expense to consider when operating diesel buses: electric block heaters. In cold climates, block heaters are a required option for diesel engines. Technicians or drivers are required to “plug in” every day or risk the possibility of a bus not starting for morning or afternoon routes. Often overlooked in TCO analysis, engine block heaters are “hidden costs” that increase operational expenses in the form of higher electricity bills and increased staff wages for technicians and drivers.
Propane increases a school district’s uptime and productivity by eliminating downtime directly linked to diesel’s extra repairs and maintenance. On top of low fuel prices, the total cost of ownership with propane accelerates a school’s return on investment and frees up funds to invest elsewhere, like in the classroom or hiring teachers.
For more information on propane-powered school buses, visit propane.com.

Michael Taylor is the director of autogas business development for the Propane Education & Research Council. Prior to joining PERC in 2012, Taylor served as director of fleet management at Heritage Propane for four years. Preceding his tenure at Heritage Propane, he enjoyed a 22-year career in the school transportation industry.
More Alternative Fuels

Alt-Fuel Moves: Fleets Power Up Beyond the Bus
See how districts are pairing electric buses with charging, solar, and V2G technology to cut costs, boost resilience, and unlock new fleet value.
Read More →
What the EPA’s Updated Clean School Bus Program Means for Fleet Electrification in 2026 and Beyond
A guide to the EPA’s evolving school bus grants, including how the Trump administration changed funding priorities and how school districts can prepare for future bus purchases.
Read More →A Solution Helping School Buses Charge Without Major Infrastructure Upgrades
Power Innovations International dishes on its EV charging technology designed to reduce infrastructure barriers, improve reliability, and support V2G applications for school bus fleets.
Read More →
New Eagle Launches All-in-One EV Control Platform
The new OpenECU NX3 platform integrates charging and vehicle controls into a single platform, with support for megawatt charging and vehicle-to-grid technologies.
Read More →
GreenPower Unveils New Heating Solution for Type A Bus
The all-electric bus manufacturer's new product aims to eliminate cold-cabin issues on its Nano BEAST zero-emission school buses operating in cold climates.
Read More →
Alt-Fuel Moves: Fleets Plug In for the Long Haul
School districts across the U.S. are moving electric school bus plans into operation, with new fleet deployments, charging infrastructure, and long-term electrification partnerships taking shape.
Read More →The Achilles Heel of School Bus Electrification: BetterFleet’s Take
BetterFleet’s managing partner discusses AI-powered EV fleet management, vehicle-to-grid challenges, and the real challenges in bus electrification today, from ACT Expo.
Read More →
You're On Your Own to Pick a Drivetrain [Op-Ed]
After years of federal pressure toward electric school buses, districts are suddenly being told to choose their own path. Let’s explore the risks, realities, and politics behind school bus drivetrain decisions.
Read More →Wattson: Thomas Built’s Largest EV School Bus Yet
Check in with Mark Childers on the new Wattson Type D electric school bus, featuring faster charging, expanded passenger capacity, and advanced safety technology.
Read More →The New Era of Electric School Buses: V2G, Bidirectional Chargers & More
The Mobility House discusses AI-powered charging, vehicle-to-grid technology, smart energy management, and the next phase of school bus electrification.
Read More →
