SBF 70 years logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

NASDPTS addresses safety vest issue

NASDPTS addresses safety vest issue In the News Alert section of the December 2001 issue of SCHOOL BUS FLEET, we published an article...

February 1, 2002
4 min to read


NASDPTS addresses safety vest issue

In the News Alert section of the December 2001 issue of SCHOOL BUS FLEET, we published an article about an interpretation of FMVSS 213 indicating that certain safety vests do not conform to the safety standard. Since then, the National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services (NASDPTS) has released a paper addressing this issue. (The full text of the document can be downloaded at www.nasdpts.org) The following narrative is drawn directly from the NASDPTS document, which is intended to provide guidance on how to most safely transport children who weigh 50 pounds or less. The issue — Section 5.3.1 of FMVSS 213, “Child Restraint Systems,” states: “Except for components designed to attach to a child restraint anchorage system, each add-on child restraint system shall not have any means designed for attaching the system to a vehicle seat cushion or vehicle seat back and any component (except belts) that is designed to be inserted between the vehicle seat cushion and vehicle seat back.” Thus, any safety harness (also known as restraining harness, vest or positioning vest/harness) that is secured to a school bus bench seat back solely by means of a webbing wrap (cam-wrap, adjusting strap, cam-harness) would not comply with this aspect of FMVSS 213. As explained in an August 2001 letter of interpretation, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) “adopted the prohibition against attaching child restraints to vehicle seat backs because the agency was concerned that a vehicle seat back would not be able to withstand the additional load on it from an attached child seat in a crash.” The letter was written in response to a request from a safety harness manufacturer that asked whether the device was subject to the requirements of FMVSS 213. Crash tests performed by NHTSA using pre-school age size dummies in school bus seats show children that weigh 40 pounds or less are safest when transported in child safety restraint systems which meet FMVSS 213, and are correctly attached to the seat through the use of the available belt and/or child seat anchorage systems in the vehicle. Guidance — Child safety restraint systems that meet the requirements of FMVSS 213 should be the first choice when transporting children who weigh 50 pounds or less in any motor vehicle, including a school bus. If a safety harness is used, it should be certified by the manufacturer as meeting all FMVSS 213 requirements, including those in Section 5.3.1. Any safety harness is best secured to the school bus seat with a lap belt and top tether. The top tether should be secured to the loading bar [the metal structure where the lap belts are bolted to the seat frame] of a “lap belt-ready” seat frame. This can be accomplished by either directly attaching the tether to the loading bar or by attaching the tether to the lap belts on the seat, since those lap belts are attached to the loading bar. The top tether should be secured to the loading bar on the seat behind the seat where the child is seated, not on the same seat that the child occupies. The top tether is not to be wrapped around the seat back cushion. The seat behind the passenger restrained by the safety harness should remain unoccupied. Additional information — NHTSA may delete certain information about safety vests from its publication “Proper Use of Child Safety Restraint Systems in School Buses,” which states that a safety vest “can be used with a lap belt and a strap (cam-wrap) that wraps around the back of the seat, to which the shoulder harness straps are hooked. The safety vest can also be used if no lap belt is present, in which case the vest is attached to the cam-wrap at the hips and shoulders.” This information conflicts with its August 2001 letter of interpretation. Also, NHTSA intends to review available information about real-world experiences with safety harnesses that are attached to the bus seat solely by a webbing wrap. If such a review indicates the devices do not present an unreasonable safety risk, the agency could decide to initiate a rulemaking to consider amendments to FMVSS 213.

Topics:Safety
Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Safety

Portrait of Michael C. Hout, Ph.D., assistant dean and psychology professor at New Mexico State University, featured in a Child Safety Network leadership announcement graphic.
Safetyby News/Media ReleaseMarch 6, 2026

Child Safety Network Taps Dr. Michael C. Hout to Combat School Bus Stop-Arm Runners

Child Safety Network appointed psychology researcher Michael C. Hout, Ph.D., to lead a study examining why drivers illegally pass stopped school buses.

Read More →
The 5th-generation Waymo Driver on the all-electric Jaguar I-PACE.
Safetyby StaffMarch 5, 2026

NTSB Determines Human Error Led to Waymo’s Illegal School Bus Passing

Investigators reported a remote assistance error allowed a Waymo driverless vehicle to illegally pass a stopped school bus in Austin.

Read More →
The side of a school bus with a retracted stop signal.
Safetyby Elora HaynesMarch 4, 2026

National Action Plan Aims to End Illegal School Bus Passings Across the U.S.

See how a new 50-state roadmap outlines 69 strategies for districts, law enforcement, and policymakers to reduce the 39 million illegal school bus passings reported each year.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
A school bus graphic with text reading "Iowa Student Killed, 14 Injured in Oklahoma Bus Crash."
Safetyby StaffMarch 3, 2026

11-Year-Old Student Dies After Falling Under School Bus

Recently, an Iowa student died after falling under a school bus, while 14 Oklahoma students were injured days later when a semi-truck rear-ended their bus.

Read More →
school bus driver
SponsoredMarch 2, 2026

7 Key Criteria for Choosing a School Bus Fleet Technology Partner

Download this white paper for clear guidance on evaluating your organization’s needs and selecting a partner who delivers long-term value.

Read More →
Graphic of a yellow school bus above the headline “The Real Cost of Downtime,” with icons illustrating overtime costs, frustrated parents and administrators, repair expenses, and route delays, emphasizing the operational and financial impact of communication failures in school transportation fleets.
SponsoredMarch 2, 2026

The Real Cost of Bus Fleet Downtime

When school bus communication systems fail, the consequences extend far beyond equipment repairs. Downtime can increase safety risks, strain dispatch operations, and erode driver confidence. Explore how proactive radio lifecycle management and managed services are reducing disruptions, supporting driver retention, and delivering predictable budgeting for school transportation fleets.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Graphic showing the EverDriven logo and “SafeOps Council Launches” text over an image of a vehicle driving on a curved road, with School Bus Fleet branding in the corner.
Safetyby News/Media ReleaseFebruary 25, 2026

EverDriven Launches New Council to Standardize Safety Across 36 States

EverDriven has launched a new safety council aimed at standardizing and strengthening student transportation practices across all states it operates in.

Read More →
a photo of a school bus driving down a suburban street with houses in the background and green grass pictured
Safetyby News/Media ReleaseFebruary 23, 2026

Thomas Built Buses Awards “If You Pass” Safety Campaign Funds to Ga. District

The OEM's three-week campaign during National School Bus Safety Week has awarded nearly $6,000 to Bryan County Schools to support increasing student safety around the bus.

Read More →
Kids need more from a driverless ride graphic comparing “Getting from A to B” vs “Student Transportation,” with a Waymo-style autonomous car image and School Bus Fleet logo.
SafetyFebruary 11, 2026

Autonomous Vehicles Aren’t Built for Student Transportation [Op-Ed]

Driverless cars may feel the future, but student transportation requires more than navigation. Here’s why it demands human judgment, empathy, and oversight.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Graphic showing the front of a yellow school bus with cracked-glass overlay and headline reading “Fatal School Bus Hit & Run in New York,” dated February 5, 2026, alongside the School Bus Fleet logo.
Safetyby Staff and News ReportsFebruary 10, 2026

New York Girl Killed by School Bus Hit & Run

An 11-year-old in Brooklyn was killed crossing the street. Meanwhile, the school bus driver faces misdemeanor charges after he left the scene.

Read More →