NHTSA Seeks Comment on Seat Belt Use Warning System in Rear Seats

Nicole Schlosser
Posted on September 27, 2019
NHTSA has issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on a requirement for a seat belt use warning system for rear seats. File photo
NHTSA has issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on a requirement for a seat belt use warning system for rear seats. File photo

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on a requirement for a seat belt use warning system for rear seats.

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012 (MAP-21) directs NHTSA to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208, ‘‘Occupant crash protection,’’ which would require the system, according to the docket. The standard requires a seat belt warning system for the driver’s seat, but not other seating positions.

The systems are designed to encourage seat belt use by reminding occupants who haven’t buckled up to do so and/or by notifying the driver that an occupant hasn’t fastened their seat belt, so that the driver can ask the occupant to put on their seat belt.

NHTSA began a rulemaking proceeding in 2013 and is now seeking public comment on a variety of issues related to the requirement, such as potential requirements for such systems, which vehicles they should apply to, their effectiveness, consumer acceptance, and the costs and benefits.

The docket states that, in particular, NHTSA is seeking comment regarding “whether a rear seat belt warning should be required for high- occupancy vehicles such as 15-passenger vans, large sport utility vehicles, school buses, and large trucks and vans with a GVWR less than or equal to 4,536 kg. (10,000 lb.)”

The deadline for submitting comments is Nov. 26. Comments may be submitted online here, or by mail or courier. For more information, read the docket in full here.

Related Topics: FMVSS, NHTSA, seat belts

Nicole Schlosser Executive Editor
Comments ( 3 )
  • Jay McMurdy

     | about 9 days ago

    Unrealistic expectations for the real world! Fact: the majority of students are in their "Concrete Operational" stage of development. This means "The rules are the rules and must be followed!" 1. Will the system "require" all occupants to buckle up? If not, we are teaching the students they can ignore the rules if they want to. EXTREMELY BAD IDEA! 2. Then "How" do we require their use? Stop the bus?? (You are making it a safety issue) Now you can expect delays and late arrivals, this disrupts class schedules and requires manpower to cope with the disturbance, monitoring the late students and making any necessary decisions. 3. How do you monitor their use? Who is responsible to insure the proper use and application? Are there different standards for various ages, body types and physical abilities? 4. How do you accommodate the additional time necessary for individual inspection? 5. Should it be a bar system like amusement park ride? This will allow for speedy loading and unloading as required in a school bus but, at a much higher cost. Anything short of a fully functional mandatory system sends the clear message that we made this rule for your protection now we'll show you how much we really care by it enforcement. I guarantee whatever message you send, it will be heard.

  • See all comments
More Stories
Michigan City (Ind). Area Schools’ transportation department recently recreated The Supremes’ famous “Stop in the Name of Love” — urging motorists to think twice before illegally passing a stopped school bus. Photo courtesy Michigan City Area Schools

School Bus Safety Ramps Up Amid Increased Stop-Arm Running Incidents

Stop-arm cameras, partnerships with law enforcement for increased traffic patrol, and public safety campaigns are just some of the measures school districts are taking to ensure the yellow bus is the safest mode of transportation for students. Lawmakers are also introducing several federal and state safety bills.

Greenville County (S.C.) Schools aide Linda (shown left) and bus driver Carlos spotted a boy who had gone missing the night before and brought him to safety. Photo courtesy Greenville County Schools

School Bus Driver, Aide Locate Missing Boy

Bus driver Carlos and aide Linda of South Carolina are driving on their morning route when they spot a boy who had gone missing the night before. They convince him to board the bus and take him to safety.


Child Found Driving School Bus Across Town

The Louisiana 10-year-old drives the bus from a local high school after it was apparently unlocked and the keys were left inside, officials say. The child is taken into custody.


Washington School Bus Driver Charged with DUI

Catherine Maccarone is allegedly driving under the influence of alcohol when she runs three red lights with students on board. She faces several charges, including two counts of reckless endangerment.

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!