SBF 70 years logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Safe passage includes curbing unseen dangers

For the second year in a row, the school bus industry has been put on the defensive by nationally publicized research suggesting that school buses spe...

by Frank Di Giacomo, Publisher
March 1, 2002
3 min to read


For the second year in a row, the school bus industry has been put on the defensive by nationally publicized research suggesting that school buses spew diesel exhaust that is harmful to the health of children in and around the bus. Last year, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) issued a report that suggested that children who ride buses are subjected to dangerous levels of diesel exhaust fumes. That “study” was performed using four old buses in notoriously smoggy Los Angeles. In addition, it was plain that the NRDC had a not-so-hidden agenda - to influence an impending vote on a proposed ban on the purchase of new diesel school buses in Southern California. As you might recall, the study was later discredited by more objective research. 2 blasts across the bow
Already this year, two studies have been released. The first was issued by Yale professor John Wargo and was brought to light on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” Wargo’s research produced findings similar to those of the NRDC, but he took the research one step further and measured pollution outside the bus. Based on his findings, Wargo suggested that school bus drivers reduce vehicle idling time by turning off their engines as soon as they reach school. He also recommended that riding times be minimized to reduce children’s exposure inside the bus. Both of these recommendations are reasonable. In fact, two states - Connecticut and New Hampshire - recently adopted anti-idling policies that will curb diesel exhaust emissions. In a separate study, the Union of Concerned Scientists reported that only six states and the District of Columbia ranked “ahead of the curve” in a national report card analyzing pollution threats from school bus fleets. Meanwhile, 23 states received a “middle of the road” ranking, and 21 states did poorly or flunked. Unlike Wargo’s research, this study wasn’t based on actual monitoring of air quality in or around buses. Instead, it used a statistical analysis of the makeup of bus fleets in each state to determine pollution levels. States with older fleets, such as California and Washington, fared worst. It’s not a particularly compelling study, but it does point out that many states are operating buses that should be replaced. Yes, more can be done
The proper response to these types of studies isn’t a blanket denial of their legitimacy. Yes, they are clearly biased against diesel and supportive of natural gas. More objective research is needed to determine whether a health hazard exists both inside and around the bus. Here’s what we do know: School transportation providers do a tremendous job in protecting children from bumps, bruises and more serious flesh-and-bone injuries. But I believe more could be done to protect them from the very real threat of air-borne contaminants. The keys to this effort will be to reduce idling times, which costs nothing and can be implemented right away, and to replace older buses with the technologically advanced vehicles that are available today from all of the school bus manufacturers. The second objective is much more problematic, given the state of the economy. Perhaps you can loosen your school board’s purse strings with the following message, corroborated by these two studies: Buying new school buses, whether they’re powered by diesel or alternative fuels, is good for the environment and sound public policy.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Alternative Fuels

Image of the outdoor vehicle expo at Virginia Clean Cities' Rally at Richmond event.
Alternative Fuelsby StaffApril 13, 2026

Virginia Clean Cities Celebrates 30 Years, Highlights Award Winners in School Bus Innovation

At its annual rally, the organization spotlighted propane and electric school bus advancements while recognizing leaders driving forward-looking student transportation.

Read More →
An orange and yellow graphic with a black and white image of an electric IC Bus school bus and text reading "Funding & the Road to Electrification."
Alternative Fuelsby Elora HaynesApril 8, 2026

Alt-Fuel Moves: Funding & the Road to Electrification

From federal oversight fixes to state funding milestones and district deployments, the transition to cleaner school transportation continues to advance.

Read More →
A yellow school bus drives along a rural road surrounded by green grass and trees under a partly cloudy sky. Overlaid text reads “SAF-T-LINER C2 GASOLINE ARRIVES,” with the School Bus Fleet logo in the corner.

Thomas Built Buses Adds Gasoline Engine Option to Saf-T-Liner C2 School Bus Lineup

The gasoline-powered bus features the Cummins B6.7 Octane engine and industry-first compression brake, joining the OEM's C2 powertrain lineup for 2026.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Row of yellow school buses with overlay text reading “The essential guide to school bus fleet maintenance: Maximizing safety and uptime” and the Geotab logo.
SponsoredApril 1, 2026

The Essential Guide to School Bus Maintenance: Maximizing Safety and Uptime

Stop reacting to engine lights and start predicting them. This guide reveals how transitioning from a "break-fix" model to a data-driven maintenance strategy can drastically reduce fleet downtime and protect your district's budget. Learn how to transform your garage operations from a cost center into a reliability powerhouse.

Read More →
Graphic displaying InCharge Energy and Foreseeson logos over an aerial facility background, highlighting a partnership to expand EV charging infrastructure in Canada.

InCharge Energy Plugs Into Canada with New Key Partnerships

InCharge Energy has expanded into Canada through partnerships with RocketEV and Foreseeson, aiming to deliver end-to-end EV charging infrastructure and support for fleet and public-sector customers.

Read More →
Graphic titled “Canada’s First Electric School Bus Report Card: 2026” with CESBA branding and an image of the report cover featuring a map of Canada

Report: Canada's Transition to Electric School Buses Lags Behind Goals

Canada’s first electric school bus report card finds that most provinces are failing the transition away from diesel buses used for student transportation.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
An orange and yellow graphic with a black and white image of Blue Bird propane school buses.
Alternative Fuelsby Elora HaynesMarch 19, 2026

Alt-Fuel Moves: EV Charging Expansion & Fleet Deployments

From EV charging growth to V2G testing and new bus deployments, districts and providers advance alt-fuel goals amid challenges.

Read More →
Buyers Guide and Directory thumbnail
SponsoredMarch 13, 2026

2026 School Bus Fleet Vendor Directory & Buyer's Guide

Searching for the right equipment, technology, or services for your school transportation program? This industry guide brings together manufacturers and suppliers across the entire school bus market, all in one place. Download it to find the partners who can help move your operation forward.

Read More →
Front view of an IC Bus next generation electric CE Series bus driving on a suburban street.
Alternative Fuelsby Elora HaynesFebruary 27, 2026

EPA Revamps Clean School Bus Program, 2024 Rebates Halted

The EPA will open a 45-day comment period and is planning a March 3 webinar as it reshapes Clean School Bus funding for 2026.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
An orange and yellow graphic with a black and white image of InCharge Energy employees working on the management system platform.
Alternative Fuelsby Elora HaynesFebruary 23, 2026

Alt-Fuel Moves: Funding Boosts & Charging Innovations

Check out some of the latest moves where alternative fuels and school buses intersect, including electric bus and charging deployments, new funding opportunities, and a new management system.

Read More →