Signed into law in January and slated for implementation in the 2002-2003 school year, President Bush's "No Child Left Behind Act" (NCLBA) has presented myriad questions and challenges to school transportation professionals across the nation. Under the legislation, which aims to give all public school students equal educational opportunity, school districts must offer students enrolled in schools identified as struggling the choice to transfer to a school with a more satisfactory academic record. The transfers will be provided at public expense, and school districts are responsible for implementing plans to achieve the intended academic parity. "Each state must establish a definition of 'adequate yearly progress' to use each year to determine the achievement of each school district and school," said U.S. Education Secretary Rod Paige in a June 14 letter. If a school fails to meet the standard for two consecutive years, it must provide public school choice. The letter, which can be viewed online at www.ed.gov/News/Letters/020614.html, states that unless a smaller amount is needed, a school district must set aside for transportation at least 5 percent but not more than 15 percent of Title I funds. These federal funds would supplement state money already allocated for transportation. Some districts with schools having a history of low test scores have already begun implementing plans for next fall. Montgomery County Public Schools in Rockville, Md., is one such school district. "What the school system has done is paired each of the under-performing schools with schools that were not in that category that had physical space to take on a larger enrollment," said Dr. Stephen Raucher, director of transportation for Montgomery County. "We are having an open registration period, and once we receive a list of how many students it's going to be, we'll route them." Several department of education officials have provided SBF with updates on what is currently being done in their states to meet the requirements of NCLBA. Here is a summary of their reports: Florida
So far only four school districts in Florida have been identified as having low-achieving schools and will need to develop school transportation strategies for parents who choose to send their children to higher-achieving schools. Transportation budgets in these districts will face increased fuel costs since students' new school choices will require that they be transported greater distances. This may also result in a need for additional drivers, school buses, technicians and routing personnel. It is unclear where sufficient funding will come from, as state legislators have recently made difficult budget cuts in education.
Source: Herman Carter, senior transportation safety specialistHawaii
The Hawaii Department of Education is developing guidelines for the personnel responsible for identifying students who are currently eligible to transfer. Verbal instructions have been given to school districts stating that they will be responsible for prioritizing eligible students. Highest priority will be given to the lowest ranking students from low-income families. The programs will impact a state transportation budget that is already anticipating a $4 million deficit for the 2002-2003 school year. The office developing the guidelines has been given criteria for determining how transportation will be funded.
Source: Cynthia Kawachi, state manager of student transportationNevada
The Nevada Legislative Committee on Education met on June 19th where the Superintendents Assn. made a presentation to request their share of state funding for the act. Because transportation issues were not included in the request, the directors of transportation in the state made a presentation with their own proposed legislative changes. Ultimately, the state committee rebuffed the superintendents, asking them to provide a more detailed funding request, which would include transportation. That report is forthcoming.
Source: Diane Hollander, state pupil transportation program managerNew Mexico
The state has identified approximately 30 schools that are subject to Title I funds for public school choice. Although the U.S. Department of Education has not established specific guidelines, it has provided some guidance to school districts that have identified schools needing improvement. We have required these districts to attend workshops held by the Title I and transportation units of the department of education, and a timetable has been set for implementation of new programs for the upcoming school year.
Source: Gilbert Perea, state director of pupil transportation
Ambitious federal act raises eyebrows
Signed into law in January and slated for implementation in the 2002-2003 school year, President Bush's "No Child Left Behind Act" (NCLBA) has present...
More Safety

Senate Report: Autonomous Car Companies Hiding Reliance on Remote Operators
Waymo’s self-driving vehicles are under fire again after repeated school bus passing violations, raising questions about safety, remote operators, and regulation.
Read More →
Industry Suppliers Offer Distracted Driving Awareness Month Reminders
Distracted driving continues to pose serious risks in school zones, with new data and driver insights highlighting ongoing concerns and potential solutions to improve student and roadway safety.
Read More →
NTSB Names Michael Graham Vice Chair: Where He Stands on School Bus Safety
A former airline pilot has stepped into a new role at the independent federal agency, but where does he stand on issues like seat belts on school buses? Here’s what he’s said.
Read More →
'A Train Is Coming': Florida School Bus Close Call Highlights Critical Railroad Safety Reminders
Two recent close calls at railroad crossings, a train clipping a bus and a rear-end crash, highlight why vigilance and training still matter. Here’s what happened and what to tell your own drivers.
Read More →
No Train, No Stop? FMCSA Considers Rule Change for School Buses
The federal agency's proposed rulemaking would eliminate the requirement for school buses to come to a complete stop at railroad crossings if the warning device is not activated. The goal: to improve traffic flow and save costs. With new data released, public comment is open through April 27, 2026.
Read More →
The Essential Guide to School Bus Maintenance: Maximizing Safety and Uptime
Stop reacting to engine lights and start predicting them. This guide reveals how transitioning from a "break-fix" model to a data-driven maintenance strategy can drastically reduce fleet downtime and protect your district's budget. Learn how to transform your garage operations from a cost center into a reliability powerhouse.
Read More →
2 Students Die in Tennessee School Bus Crash with Dump Truck
A Carroll County accident claimed the lives of two students and injured over a dozen others on a March 27 field trip for eighth graders at Clarksville-Montgomery County.
Read More →
School Bus Laws to Watch: Stop-Arm Enforcement, EV Mandates & Seat Belts
From North Dakota public charter school regulations, tracking illegal school bus passing consequences in multiple states, and the continued debate on New York’s electric school bus mandate, here’s the latest in school bus legislation across the U.S.
Read More →
Boosting K-12 Attendance With Innovative Transportation Solutions
While the yellow school bus remains the backbone of student transit, 75% of administrators identify limited transportation access as a major driver of chronic absenteeism. This guide explores how districts are strengthening their fleets by integrating flexible, supplemental solutions to serve students with the most complex needs. Learn how a multimodal approach can bridge service gaps, restore attendance, and support your most vulnerable populations.
Read More →
Michigan District Rolls Out New Stop-Arm Program
Grand Rapids Public Schools is partnering up with BusPatrol and Dean Transportation to outfit the entire bus fleet with cameras.
Read More →
