Shenendehowa Central Schools partners with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to conduct audits and training related to safety and incident command.
If you ever need a reminder about the importance of what you and the people you work with do every day, keep reading.
An 11-year-old girl was awarded $36.1 million on Thursday, Sept. 21, by a jury in San Bernardino, California, that found that Durham School Services and one of its drivers was mostly liable for her injuries in a school bus stop incident in 2012. The jury placed 50% of the blame on Durham, 30% on the bus driver, and 20% on the child’s mother for allowing her daughter to cross the street outside a crosswalk, court records show.
Both the girl, who was 6 years old at the time of the accident, and the driver of the car that struck her, who was traveling under the speed limit, were ruled not at fault.
The girl, who suffered a brain injury and required 24-hour care from a nurse, was awarded $20,143,291 for future economic damages, $5 million for past pain and suffering, and $11 million for future pain and suffering, according to court records.
The basis of the lawsuit was negligence. The plaintiffs alleged that Durham failed to report and prevent dangerous mid-street crossings, proving it was typical for parents and students to walk to the school bus by crossing in the middle of the block in violation of the company’s policies and procedures.
A disciplinary system is in place for such violations, according to a news release from the law firm that represented the plaintiffs, citing witnesses for both Durham and the San Bernardino City Unified School District. Under the system, students who violate the rules get a verbal warning and then a written warning. Discipline can eventually include losing school bus privileges.
In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs claimed that not only did the school bus not have its flashing lights and stop signs engaged, but the school bus drivers who were assigned to the route never reported to their superiors that it was regular practice for students to cross the street illegally to get on the bus.
The company “is supposed to be the eyes and ears of the school district to monitor all things that are unsafe that occur out at the bus stops,” said Geoffrey Wells, an attorney who represented the girl and her family.
Wells said the school district’s transportation director testified that the district relies on drivers to report dangerous conditions at bus stops, including unsafe mid-block crossings. According to Wells, although two bus drivers testified that they didn’t see the dangerous crossings, four witnesses testified that they jaywalked daily in front of the bus driver to get to the bus stop.
This verdict comes two years after another San Bernardino jury awarded $20.5 million to the mother of a 15-year-old boy who was killed while crossing five lanes of highway traffic to get to a school district designated bus stop. The driver of the car that hit him said she did not see him. He died of his injuries a few months later.
In that lawsuit, the Chaffey Joint Union High School District attempted to place blame for the accident on the student and the driver who hit him, but the jury assigned 100% liability to the school district.
The student was walking to a school bus stop that required him to cross an uncontrolled, five-lane highway. California law prohibits bus stops “on a divided or multiple-lane highway where pupils must cross the highway to board … unless traffic is controlled.”
Several years prior, the district eliminated one of two bus stops located on either side of the highway, which reportedly forced students to cross the highway through traffic in an unmarked crosswalk without traffic signals or a crossing guard. The plaintiff’s counsel made a point to emphasize that the decision to remove the bus stop was made without alerting the California Highway Patrol or the school district’s superintendent.
The school district initially claimed that the stop it eliminated was still available on the date of the crash. The plaintiffs proved, however, that it was not. The school district re-designated it as a stop shortly after the student died.
The school district initially denied that the bus stop existed at all and refused to acknowledge or authenticate documents referring to the stop obtained by the plaintiff’s counsel. But after witness depositions revealed that the district instructed officials to routinely destroy documents at the end of every school year, San Bernardino County Superior Court Judge Brian S. McCarville ordered a hearing to reconsider the testimony of several school district employees and subsequently found new evidence on a jump drive that was submitted to the court by the school district.
Apparently emails and school bus route maps proving the stop’s existence had been misplaced originally in one of the computer folders on the drive containing attorney-client privileged correspondence and thus had not been found during the discovery phase of the lawsuit by the plaintiff’s counsel.
After the verdict, counsel for the plaintiff in the Chaffey case was quoted as saying, “I think this will be a wake-up call to school districts across the state to make sure they’re doing things legally, appropriately, and safely for the benefit of our children.”
Both of these cases are, indeed, wake-up calls. While Washington, D.C., continues to focus on safety inside the school bus, let’s not lose sight of the fact that children being struck getting on and off school buses remains the cause of more fatalities and many debilitating injuries. We must always maintain a sharp focus on preventing all forms of injury to children entrusted to us every school day.
Stephen W. Puchta, the Ohio State Director of Pupil Transportation, passed away unexpectedly on March 13. He was 65.
Cobb County School District adopts Synovia Solutions’ “Here Comes the Bus” app and smart fleet technology on its approximately 1,000 buses.
Officials at Dynamic Specialty Services say that the new facility in Edmonton, Alberta, will offer a range of parts and Blue Bird buses.
Winners of the company's 2018 Dealer of the Year, Pursuit of Excellence, and Diamond Dealer awards are recognized for their efforts to improve sales, market share, and customer satisfaction.
The school bus manufacturer cites lower upfront costs and ease of fueling accessibility as key factors in the growing sales of its Vision Gasoline bus.
The legislation would allow a person who is at least 18 years old but under 21 to be licensed to drive a commercial motor vehicle.
Not only is there a need for more new technicians, but for those who are well-versed in new technologies.
The Propane Education and Research Council’s new website contains information about propane in a variety of forms, including videos, customer case studies, emissions data, and fact sheets.
The director of transportation at Florence (Ariz.) Unified School District #1 shares some of her transportation department's best practices.
The Here Comes the Bus Lite version is designed to serve smaller school districts, and will be made more affordable without the additional cost of routing software.
Even though ESC is not required on new school buses in the U.S.,many OEMs are making the technology standard, guaranteeing school districts provide safe, efficient transportation for students.
Bethel School District’s new Blue Bird Vision Propane buses are expected to produce nitrogen oxide emissions at 0.02 NOx.
A growing demand for propane buses in recent years has sparked an influx of training programs for maintenance technicians. Here, industry experts share top tips and best practices for maintaining propane school buses.
A transportation director works with a local college on an electric school bus repair program for high school students as the need for technicians to maintain these alt-fuel buses is forecasted to grow significantly.