Pupil transportation leaders can work with their state highway safety offices (SHSOs) to fund projects related to school bus safety. - Screenshot taken from virtual workshop held by National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services

Pupil transportation leaders can work with their state highway safety offices (SHSOs) to fund projects related to school bus safety.

Screenshot taken from virtual workshop held by National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services

Every year the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) administers funding to states for their annual highway safety plans; however, only a portion of those funds are allocated to projects dedicated to improving school bus safety.

On Tuesday, during a National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services virtual workshop, two industry representatives shared how pupil transportation leaders could change that — citing strategies for building connections with state highway safety offices (SHSOs) and assessing the ways in which funding opportunities could be used.

Derek Graham, a consultant and former state director of pupil transportation in North Carolina, focused on the importance of attendees fostering a relationship with their SHSO, as it is often the division who oversees the distribution of funding received from NHTSA’s Highway Safety Program Section 402.

Section 402, which provides grants for each state’s annual highway safety plan, according to Graham, has highlighted significant gaps in funding between school transportation and the rest of highway safety in most states from 2017 to 2020.

During that period, approximately five to six states received annual funding for school bus safety-related projects. Those projects included safety education resources, stop-arm enforcement programs, and various training initiatives.

“It’s not just about grabbing some money, but being able to do some things that you aren’t normally funded to do where you can focus on safety,” Graham said. “Very rarely would the highway safety office approach any of us, even if they know that someone is in charge of school transportation."

He added that that is one of the reasons why state pupil transportation directors need to get involved.

Pam Shadel Fischer, senior director of external engagement for the Governors Highway Safety Association, echoed similar sentiments, providing background on how pupil transporters can know if their safety project is eligible for grant funding.

Based on a diagram she used during a grant training presentation for the Nevada Office of Traffic Highway Safety last year, Fischer detailed a three-step grant eligibility test:

1. Will you use the grant funds for one of the program areas your SHSO is focused on?

Fischer said each state usually has their top highway safety program areas. The “big three,” she added, are: occupant protection (seat belts), impaired driving, and speeding.

2. Can you or your organization pay the project expenses, and then wait 90 days to get reimbursed?

Fischer reminded attendees that funding provided through state highway safety plans are more often than not indirect grants.

3. Are you or your organization able to provide traffic safety data that demonstrates how your program will save lives on our roadways and be able to demonstrate using performance measures?

Fischer told attendees that if their safety initiative cannot demonstrate and deliver actionable data, then it would most likely not be considered for funding.

As the former director of New Jersey’s Division of Highway Traffic Safety, Fischer concluded the workshop by highlighting some of the program areas that she has seen/sees potential for pupil transportation in working with SHSOs. Those program areas included:

  • Pedestrian Safety: conspicuity, safe walking tips.
  • Bicyclist Safety: rider education, bicycle helmets, conspicuity.
  • Distracted Driving/walking: parent/student/staff education (tech use in and near school zones), bus driver policy.
  • Aggressive driving/speeding: stopping for stopped school buses (stop-arm cameras).
  • Occupant protection: seat belts and car seats on buses, parent carpools.

The underlying factor for all these program areas is “You’ve got to have relevant data, crash data, citation data, observational data such as video from school bus cameras or video surveillance in school zones, and surveys of parents and students,” Fischer explained. “You need these elements to really back up the funding you’re asking for.”

For FY2020, a total of $279.6 million in funding was available for NHTSA's Highway Traffic Safety Program Section 402, authorized by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, also known as the FAST Act.

While the current FAST Act expired on Sept. 30, President Donald Trump signed a continuation resolution on Oct. 1 that would extend the legislation (and funding) for one more year, according to Fischer. She added that Congress is currently working on the next reauthorization to determine future highway safety funding opportunities, both at the state and local level.

0 Comments