Task Force Supports Transportation’s Role in a Return to the Classroom
The STARTS Task Force report does not mandate one direct pathway to get students back to school safely. It provides a process to make sure that all the relevant decisions are considered and addressed.
by Curt Macysyn
July 27, 2020
The STARTS report does not mandate one direct pathway to get students back to school safely. It provides a process to ensure that all the relevant decisions are considered and addressed.
File photo courtesy Mitzi Bowers
3 min to read
In early May, the three major student transportation associations joined to create the Student Transportation Aligned for Return To School or STARTS Task Force for short. This collaboration was the result of discussions within the group about the challenges facing pupil transportation throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The task force relied upon the expertise of more than 75 volunteers to review state reopening plans and other reports that provided information or protocols related to COVID-19 and student transportation.
This herculean task was spearheaded by Tim Ammon, co-founder of Decision Support Group, and Jim Regan of CapitalWorks Consulting Group, who were named task force co-managers at the inception of the process. It was truly a team effort, as Jim and Tim pored over an incredible amount of research, and ultimately were able to form a consensus among the three STARTS subcommittees in developing appropriate guidelines and tasks.
Ad Loading...
The resulting report does not mandate pupil transportation professionals to follow one direct pathway to get students back to school safely, but instead provides a process to make sure that all the relevant decisions are considered and addressed. Overall, the challenge that faces student transportation remains a dynamic that comes into play quite often with respect to decisions about education: local control.
Certainly, uniform guidance would have been the best solution, but that’s just not feasible when educational decisions are mostly crafted, decided, and implemented at the local level. Also, we still must be mindful that COVID-19 has impacted regions and areas of the country differently, and at different times. A “one-size-fits-all” approach would simply not allow enough flexibility for schools to develop plans based upon information at their disposal.
Overall, think of the report as a resource written and developed by student transportation professionals for student transportation professionals. After all, we are the ones who have the experience and expertise to successfully create policy in this area.
To that end, the report outlines 27 separate guidelines for the transportation community to consider. It contains a “Transportation Reopening Plan,” which is an interactive Gantt Chart that can be used by transportation directors or school bus contractors to ensure that they stay on task.
Curt Macysyn is the executive director of the National School Transportation Association.
Photo courtesy Curt Macysyn
In ensuring that transportation professionals consider the guidelines in the report, there are approximately 250 tasks that should be reviewed, if appropriate. Additionally, there is one area that must continue to be emphasized: While these guidelines and tasks address many elements of the pupil transportation system, transportation professionals and contractors must adhere to applicable state and local public health orders, as well as any appropriate state and federal agency regulations and guidelines.
The report was underwritten with the support of the American School Bus Council, whose membership includes the National School Transportation Association (NSTA), National Association for Pupil Transportation (NAPT), and National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services (NASDPTS), as well as Blue Bird, IC Bus, and Thomas Built Buses. In addition, I’d like to thank the STARTS Task Force Advisory Committee - John Barrington (Blue Bird), Trish Reed (IC Bus), Linda Bluth, Ed.D. (NAPT Foundation), Elizabeth Clark (National Association of School Nurses), James “Jed” Routh (Thomas Built Buses), and Susan Shutrump (Trumbull County Educational Service Center).
Also, our subcommittee chairs did a great job of staying on task and lending their expertise in providing the content of the report. They include: Peter Lawrence, Ed.D. (NAPT), Robert Manspeaker (NASDPTS), and Bob Ramsdell (NSTA) on the Health and Safety Committee. Meanwhile, M. Matt Sanchez (NAPT), Tina Spence M.Ed. (NASDPTS), and Bree Allen (NSTA) headed up Communications, Advocacy, and Public Relations. Finally, Kayne M. Smith Ed.D (NAPT), Mike Stier (NASDPTS), and Darryl P. Hill Ph.D. (NSTA) led the Scheduling, Routing and School Buses Committee. Thanks, everyone, for a job well done!
As the pace of fleet electrification increases and charging infrastructure continues to pose challenges, many fleets find themselves puzzling over the question: how do I install charging infrastructure faster and more cost-efficiently?
Executive Editor Wes Platt offers parting thoughts as he parks the School Bus Fleet bus to focus on ultra-local community journalism, making way for someone else to take the wheel as the pupil transportation industry continues to evolve.
Children's Mental Health Awareness Day underscores the significance of school bus drivers in fostering supportive environments during students' journeys. SAMHSA's initiatives, including stigma reduction and access to resources, complement the Biden-Harris administration's funding efforts to enhance youth mental health services and workforce development.
How do you think the potential shift to permanent Daylight Saving Time or standard time would impact our daily lives and routines, especially considering the divided approach across various states?
I remain impressed by the matter-of-fact heroism that’s often demonstrated by school bus drivers like Deona Washington who are caught in these situations where the best of us might lose our cool and panic. But, then again, bus drivers are a unique breed.
Most applicants sought grant funding to acquire electric school buses, with propane coming in a distant second. No one indicated plans to purchase compressed natural gas (CNG) buses in this round. That’s not terribly surprising, I suppose, given how few school districts listed the inclusion of CNG buses in their fleets for our 2023 top district fleets survey.
Calendar pages keep flipping toward the mandates set in states like New York and California to transition their school bus fleets from diesel to zero-emission, but there’s plenty of reluctance and pushback.
Today, California prides itself on utilizing the most zero-emission (ZE) school buses in the country with over 1,689 being used by California school districts; and while the state is on a positive health trajectory thanks to a decree to eliminate gas and diesel vehicles, more work needs to be done to improve children’s well-being.
Bus drivers are the primary caretakers of children during their commute and thus bear responsibility for their safety. By prioritizing proper operating procedures, maintenance checks, and additional precautions, drivers can help avoid the loss of precious young lives under their care.
FMCSA proposes to amend certain Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to ensure the safe introduction of automated driving systems (ADS)-equipped commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) onto the nation’s roadways. The proposed changes to the CMV operations, inspection, repair, and maintenance regulations prioritize safety and security, promote innovation, foster a consistent regulatory approach to ADS-equipped CMVs, and recognize the difference between human operators and ADS.
