Author |
Topic |
|
Formerly Known As 80-RE4
Active Member
USA
20 Posts |
Posted - 05/17/2011 : 06:00:48 AM
|
I don't believe I've ever written about this as this happened a few years ago and it's been in the back of my head ever since.
My rule of thumb is that you are to ALWAYS stop at railroad tracks unless there is a sign that displays Exempt. Me and another driver were going to pick up another bus which required us to go over two railroad crossings. I was not driving, the other driver was. The driver has been around a lot longer than me and he knew that the tracks were no longer used. In that town, whenever I came upon those tracks, I always put to use proper RR crossing procedures.
When this driver approached the tracks, he said they aren't used anymore (there was NO sign that said Exempt) and he did not perform proper RR crossing procedures. He simply went over the two tracks at the speed limit. I did not say anything as I felt he was the senior driver and much older than me.
1. What would you have done?
Also, there is a lot of disagreement about whether or not you have to stop at a set of tracks that are on a major route where the speed limit is 45. The road is a two lane, heavily used road. There are a set of traffic lights that 99% of the time display green. I've never seen a train come through. I used to have a route that went by the crossings and I would always stop. I would first activate my four ways, then tap on my breaks well ahead of time, as well as put on my ambers for one to two seconds about two to three times to notify speeding traffic that I was coming to a stop. (Note: I would not keep the ambers on for more than 2 seconds), I did not want to get rear ended. It may have been wrong for me to activate them but I felt tapping on the brakes (showing the red brake lights ahead of time, as well as the 4ways, and very shortly activating the ambers on and off) would alert traffic that I am stopping.
Question: Some drivers believe that because this light never changes, and it is on a highway with a high speed limit, that you do not have to stop. Most people drove 55-60.
From your opinion, do you agree with me, that you must stop at these tracks?
The city where these are located did a horrible job. If a driver was not familiar with the area, they would probably not see the tracks until it was too late. The RR signs were 5 feet from the tracks. Almost no warning, on a major, "high speed" heavily used route.
|
|
overbyja
Senior Member
USA
123 Posts |
Posted - 05/17/2011 : 11:51:25 AM
|
There are number of factors you bring up here. Are these traffic lights you're talking about exclusively protecting the RR Xing or are they for a parallel cross street? The general rule of thumb is that a traffic signal that exclusively protects the RR Xing overrides the stopping rule, unless of course it is red. In lower Michigan, there is a freeway (US 127) that crosses some tracks at grade and is protected by both flashing red lights and a traffic signal. There are signs that say "Trucks and Buses Need Not Stop when Signal is Green". Just to be sure, I would check with your local authorities. |
|
|
|
Thomas Ford 85-16
Top Member
USA
4177 Posts |
Posted - 05/19/2011 : 3:41:58 PM
|
What overby said! The green light on a red-yellow-green traffic signal is sort of "almighty" in these matters. That is, IF it's there exclusively for the rail road tracks. As for the social aspect of your question...probably wasn't any need to say anything in that situation since no one was actually in danger. Just do what you already do. If it makes you feel any better, I stop at even Exempt signs. I am in Michigan, and our normal vehicle code says that commercial vehicles do not need to stop where an Exempt sign is displayed, however the Pupil Transportation Act, where it mentions school buses needing to stop, does NOT contain that allowance. As I see it, a school bus still needs to stop. Further, our law says that a stop is not needed only if tracks are abandoned AND tracks are removed AND signs are removed. So, I've stopped at crossings where there were no tracks but there were signs, and I've stopped at crossings where there were no signs but were tracks. (And actually one of those was still active. ) |
Mike's Bus Yard - http://buses.zwebpages.com - Since 1999
|
|
|
matts4290
Advanced Member
224 Posts |
Posted - 05/20/2011 : 07:14:33 AM
|
They've always told us that if in doubt, to go ahead and stop anyway, and yes, in Michigan, if the traffic light is controlled with the railroad crossing, you do not have to stop. Edwardsburg, Michigan is riddled with these. Especially the intersection of US 12 and 62. IMO, and as a rule of thumb, even if you flash your amber lights, you have to do what you have to do to get the other drivers' attention. My driving instructor once told me in a lose-lose situation, you do what you have to do. I don't care what the law says if my kids are in danger. |
We can't all be conventional! http://www.youtube.com/user/matts4290 |
Edited by - matts4290 on 05/20/2011 07:16:33 AM |
|
|
bluebirdvision
Top Member
USA
1081 Posts |
|
JK
Top Member
USA
7307 Posts |
Posted - 05/25/2011 : 10:14:59 PM
|
We had an abandoned railroad crossing, which the only tracks were across the road, the tracks had long since been removed from both sides of the road. As stupid as stupid can be we were required to stop at those tracks. The road was finally widened and the tracks removed ending the debate. (jk)
Stop Violence on the school buses! Stop bullying and other violence - Complete with excellent video! According to the American Public Health Association, the school bus is the second most common place for bullying to occur (the first is on the playground). This Fast Track slide presentation can help stop bullying on the school buses. Includes class handouts. Free to use in self-study, for class training, and for presentation to the school board. Click Here for Link (See Post # 14)
Stopping Violence on School Buses: Not an Easy Task but One that Can be Accomplished - Click here for source.
|
|
|
busfan1979
Active Member
13 Posts |
Posted - 05/26/2011 : 5:31:34 PM
|
I stop regardless of whether the tracks are in use or abandoned. I would not want to put the kids safety in jeopardy because of something stupid like where the tracks are located. Even if there is a sign, I would still stop at all crossings. Just how I was trained. |
Edited by - busfan1979 on 05/26/2011 5:32:43 PM |
|
|
WallyG
Advanced Member
United States
255 Posts |
Posted - 05/27/2011 : 04:50:46 AM
|
If this comes up advise mamagement they can have the "exempt" signs put up. Drivers sometimes have to do stupid things I don't agree if the tracks are gone on both sides of the street? Is there a cop on earth that would give a ticket to a bus driver who just went through the intersection? |
|
|
Thomas Ford 85-16
Top Member
USA
4177 Posts |
Posted - 05/31/2011 : 5:26:48 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by WallyG
If this comes up advise mamagement they can have the "exempt" signs put up. Drivers sometimes have to do stupid things I don't agree if the tracks are gone on both sides of the street? Is there a cop on earth that would give a ticket to a bus driver who just went through the intersection?
Sometimes following stupid laws is a way to get them changed! |
|
|
littlebit
Advanced Member
431 Posts |
Posted - 06/07/2011 : 5:26:19 PM
|
Its been a long time but this post brought me back..
On my route I have a set of tracks, I personally watched the landowners pull these tracks out on both sides. The tracks on the road are left, the city doesn't want to fix the road and neither does the county..so the tracks stay. I was not stopping, but then at the state meeting TN..we were told that even if we knew the tracks were inactive we still had to stop. So now I activate my flashers, stop the bus, pop the air brake, look to my left. look to my right and look up..I figure I have as much of a chance of a train falling out of the sky as I have one hitting me.. LOL Notice I don't open my door...it is not in the best part of town and I am alone when I stop 1st thing in the am and the last thing in the afternoon. |
Bus 34 |
|
|
JK
Top Member
USA
7307 Posts |
Posted - 06/09/2011 : 07:37:06 AM
|
"Sometimes following stupid laws is a way to get them changed!"
True enough, Thomas Ford 85-16. Regardless, in some cases where obeying a law presents a dangerous hazard or some other horrific outcome another answer may be to ignore that law. Would guess it depends what country we live in, since in this country the original intention was that the people run the government, not the government running the people. Civil disobedience is a mitigated right in our nation, but not without cost. A decision has to be made. I obeyed the stupid demand concerning the RR tracks on the road mentioned in an earlier post, while some drivers ignored those tracks. Each made their decision come what may. (jk)
Stopping Violence on School Buses: Not an Easy Task but One that Can be Accomplished - Click here for source.
|
Edited by - JK on 06/09/2011 07:38:29 AM |
|
|
schoolbuses2007@aol.com
Active Member
USA
17 Posts |
Posted - 06/19/2011 : 4:03:47 PM
|
Hello.
I'm from Delaware, and for the 2010 - 2011 school year DE passed a law that ALL school Buses were to stop at all RR crossings even if there were no students on the bus. When I first started driving we were able to just drive right over them when we were empty. Even though we have that law in effect a lot of Buses dont pay attention to it. They just go right past them. As for the stopping at a RR where the speed limit is 45MPH or better, we are still required to stop no matter what. Even if the track are "Exempt" We have to stop. The only exception is if there is a building built on the track that are no longer in use.
Fred |
|
|
RweThereYet
Active Member
USA
37 Posts |
Posted - 12/02/2011 : 5:42:47 PM
|
I know I'm a bit late to this dance but for what it is worth I'd be stopping in accordance with my state and schools regulations rather than take the risk of making myself personally liable; and likewise, I wouldn't go making up my own procedure for how I operate the bus. |
|
|
Andypd
New Member
1 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2012 : 3:03:03 PM
|
I found this whole thread very interesting to read as I am a driving instructor from the uk and I do take alot of interest in driving from around the world, i obviously can't give you any additional advice on this particular situation, but just let you know that signs and markings in the uk are also neglected to enable councils to save their money. |
Andy d www.impactdriving.co.uk |
|
|
Trailboss
Senior Member
United States
196 Posts |
Posted - 01/23/2012 : 05:02:55 AM
|
Railroad crossing signs are under Federal jurisdiction and no local or state jurisdiction can change a rail crossing. Thats why it takes so long to get anything done with the abanden crossings.The rails can be completly gone but as long as the signs are still there you must stop unless there is an exempt sign. |
|
|
RD9000
Senior Member
72 Posts |
Posted - 09/21/2012 : 12:15:44 PM
|
It is interesting how laws/rules on railroad crossings vary from state to state. School buses in Oklahoma are only required to stop at railroad crossings when students are on board. Some districts have policies that require you stop at all crossings regardless and some do not. |
|
|
Trailboss
Senior Member
United States
196 Posts |
Posted - 09/24/2012 : 03:24:59 AM
|
RD9000 you might want to check that out with the State Director Trent Gibson the law was recently changed in OK.You must now stop even if students are not on. |
|
|
RD9000
Senior Member
72 Posts |
Posted - 09/24/2012 : 12:40:14 PM
|
That's good to know. My driving hat is off for now these days unfortunately! |
|
|
Troy992
New Member
1 Posts |
Posted - 12/20/2019 : 05:08:46 AM
|
I know I'm several years late to this rodeo, but I can't find an answer to my question of Do school buses have to stop and open doors at dr tracks if only the driver is in the bus, i.e. no passengers on board? Thanks |
|
|
ACL
Senior Member
USA
53 Posts |
Posted - 12/30/2019 : 12:44:32 PM
|
There's no one answer. School bus drivers will follow district policy and state law.
Are you a driver? If so, does your training include this, does your ops manual cover it, and is it addressed in state law? In my case it is yes, yes, yes, and yes. Our ops manual (and training) also discourage us from crossing specific tracks that are not signaled but also not marked as abandoned. We can cross them if needed, but would have to use the full crossing procedure which would be a major disruption to traffic which doesn't expect that. |
|
|
bedfordone
Active Member
USA
47 Posts |
Posted - 01/15/2020 : 10:37:54 AM
|
Short answer is yes to both questions. When in doubt error on the side of caution. |
Brian Prochazka Bedford City Schools Transportation Specialist |
|
|
Brook Peacock
Senior Member
116 Posts |
Posted - 09/25/2020 : 05:37:46 AM
|
Still follow policy in your state would be the best bet. |
|
|
RBurt
New Member
USA
8 Posts |
Posted - 12/28/2020 : 11:32:27 AM
|
Follow your state's policy, but generally unless the tracks are marked exempt or there is law enforcement/railroad employee telling you to proceed, you must stop. |
|
|
Brook Peacock
Senior Member
116 Posts |
Posted - 12/30/2020 : 04:13:30 AM
|
Exactly! |
|
|
|
Topic |
|