DENVER — An insurance pool that provides coverage to 130 of the 178 school districts in Colorado has approved a plan that will curtail the use of non-conforming vans for student transportation. The Colorado School Districts Self Insurance Pool (CSDSIP) voted to stop adding new or used 15-passenger vans (used for transporting students) to its policies beginning July 1. Coverage of 15-passenger vans put into service before July 1 will continue until 2007, but with a minimum surcharge of $1,500. After Jan. 1, 2007, the pool will not insure any 15-passenger vans. In a memo to superintendents and transportation supervisors of participating districts, Cheryle Sullivan, executive director of CSDSIP, said the four-and-a-half-year phase-out period gives districts ample time to replace vans with Type A school buses or allowable alternate vehicles. “CSDSIP realizes that by taking this proactive measure it will affect members financially and considered this when developing the plan,” Sullivan said in the memo. “However, we do believe the No. 1 priority is the safety and security of students.” Bruce Little, Colorado’s state pupil transportation director, said the insurance pool took matters into its own hands. “Since the General Assembly is not interested in phasing out the vans, the insurance company will,” he said. The measure also eliminates coverage of rented or leased 15-passenger vans beginning July 1. Vans used for purposes other than student transportation, such as in maintenance or food service, will still be eligible for coverage. The following table shows van use by state as of January 2002. At least a half-dozen states have changed their stance on the use of non-conforming vans for school transportation since we last gathered this data two years ago. The movement is universally in one direction — toward prohibiting the use of 10-plus passenger vehicles that don’t meet school bus safety standards. Van Use By State
State | Approved for home-to-school | Approved for activity trips |
---|---|---|
Alabama | No | No |
Alaska | No | Yes |
Arizona | No | Yes |
Arkansas | No | No |
California | No | No |
Colorado | Yes | Yes |
Connecticut | No | Yes |
Delaware | No | No |
Florida | No | No |
Georgia | No | n/a |
Hawaii | No | No |
Idaho | Yes | Yes |
Illinois | No | Yes |
Indiana | Yes | Yes |
Iowa | No | No |
Kansas | No | No |
Kentucky | No | No |
Louisiana | No | No |
Maine | No | No |
Maryland | No | No |
Massachusetts | Yes | Yes |
Michigan | Yes | Yes |
Minnesota | Yes | Yes |
Mississippi | No | No |
Missouri | Yes | Yes |
Montana | No | No |
Nebraska | No | No |
Nevada | No | Yes |
New Hampshire | No | No |
New Jersey | No | No |
New Mexico | n/a | n/a |
New York | No | No |
North Carolina | No | Yes |
North Dakota | No | No |
Ohio | No | No |
Oklahoma | No | No |
Oregon | No | No |
Pennsylvania | No | No |
Rhode Island | No | Yes |
South Carolina | No | No |
South Dakota | No | No |
Tennessee | No | No |
Texas | No | Yes |
Utah | No | No |
Vermont | Yes | Yes |
Virginia | No | No |
Washington | No | No |
West Virginia | No | Yes |
Wisconsin | Yes | Yes |
Wyoming | No | No |
0 Comments
See all comments