Md. districts aim to capture stop-arm violations

Thomas McMahon
Posted on March 8, 2012
Frederick County (Md.) adopted a stop-arm camera ordinance in February. This photo, of officials from the school district's transportation department and three law enforcement agencies, was taken when legislation was initiated.

Frederick County (Md.) adopted a stop-arm camera ordinance in February. This photo, of officials from the school district's transportation department and three law enforcement agencies, was taken when legislation was initiated.

Several counties in Maryland are turning to stop-arm cameras to combat the persistent problem of illegal school bus passing.

Veronica Lowe, director of transportation for Frederick County Public Schools, told SBF that her district has seen an increase in the number of bus-passing incidents in recent years. The tally for the 2010-11 school year was 457, although that only includes the violations that the district's bus drivers were able to record. In the previous school year, the total was 231.

"We recognized that it was a huge problem that was affecting the safety of our students," Lowe said.

She and other leaders from Frederick County took the issue to the state General Assembly. They worked on state legislation, enacted in spring 2011, that enables Maryland counties to pass their own bills to allow the use of stop-arm cameras in citing motorists who illegally drive by stopped school buses.

"We saw that other states had bills named after a child who was killed" in a stop-arm running incident, Lowe noted. "We wanted to get legislation out there before that happened."

Frederick County adopted a stop-arm camera ordinance on Feb. 7. Previously, a stop-arm runner could only be cited if a police officer witnessed the violation.

The school district is now in the process of selecting a vendor to provide stop-arm cameras. A few systems will be tested in a side-by-side comparison.

Lowe said that the interested vendors had been asked "to be very specific about the cameras, the clarity, what they could capture, what speed, how many lanes over. And for the processing of that data — how it would transfer over to the sheriff and what they would have to do as far as review and approving."

Frederick County Public Schools expects to equip about 40 of its 433 buses with the camera systems. It is expected that the vendor will supply the cameras at no cost based on a split of the fines that are collected, with the county getting the rest (the proportions haven't been determined yet). The fines can be up to $250.

"We wanted to make it clear that this isn't a moneymaker for us," Lowe noted. "Our hope is that the violations will go down to zero."

Toward that end, the district will also launch a campaign to educate the public about stop-arm violations.

Elsewhere in Maryland, Washington County’s commissioners on Tuesday approved an enabling ordinance for stop-arm cameras. It will go to a public hearing within the next few weeks.

“Our sheriff’s department is really spearheading this, which is wonderful,” said Barbara Scotto, supervisor of transportation for Washington County Public Schools.

Also, grant money has been used to have officers on overtime crack down on stop-arm running. And Scotto said that Washington County is working to educate the public on when and why they need to stop for school buses.

Montgomery County passed its own legislation on Tuesday.

Todd Watkins, director of transportation for Montgomery County Public Schools, said that his district is waiting for approval of funding for the camera systems. He expects to initially outfit about 25 buses with the units, at a cost of around $5,000 to $8,000 each.

The district already has some basic stop-arm cameras, but Watkins said that the new systems will be much more sophisticated, with motion detection and automatic sending of the data to law enforcement.

The new systems will be moved from bus to bus as needed, targeting areas with higher rates of illegal bus passing.

Before the new cameras go into service, the district will do a media blitz to get the word out. Watkins said he expects the cameras to be a significant deterrent.

"Our county has a lot of intersection cameras and speed cameras. You can see people changing their behavior around those," he said. "All we're looking to do is change behavior in the area of school buses."

In Charles County, the school district and the sheriff's department have been working together to develop a school bus stop-arm camera program.

"We are currently running a pilot with two vendors on six school buses," said Richard Wesolowski, director of transpor-tation for Charles County Public Schools. "[We] have not made any definitive decision yet. However, cost is going to be a big factor."

Related Topics: Maryland, stop-arm running/illegal passing, video surveillance

Thomas McMahon Executive Editor
Comments ( 4 )
  • Becky Thompson

     | about 8 years ago

    I think that is such a good idea, it should be used in all states I live in Michigan and it is unreal to see how many motorist do not pay attention to the stop arms on school busses and or the flashing yellow or red lights. Good for Ms. Lowe for seeing this through.

  • See all comments
More Stories

School Bus Songs: 'Follow the Rules'

In a parody of the Bee Gees’ “Stayin’ Alive,” the transportation team at West Des Moines (Iowa) Community Schools outlines several school bus safety rules while donning their best 70s attire.


Multi-Protocol, Portable Radios

JVCKenwood’s NX-1200 and NX-1300 portable radios operate in two digital protocols — NXDN and DMR — and analog, enabling multi-protocol operation and the capability to transition to digital with mixed-mode operation.

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!