NSTA Advocacy in Action — How Our Regulatory Efforts Benefit Contractors

John Benish Jr.
Posted on January 7, 2020

File photo
File photo
One of the most important goals of any trade association is to advocate for the industry it represents. At the National School Transportation Association (NSTA), we pride ourselves on being an effective advocate for private school bus contractors around the country. This also includes working with the National Association for Pupil Transportation (NAPT) and student transportation state directors when school bus safety is being discussed. We take our role of representing pupil transportation seriously, and for this reason we engage in policy debates in several places, one of which is the regulatory arena.

Regulatory analysis is not usually an activity that gets much attention from the general public. We are on constant guard when it comes to regulatory issues; as we know, the yellow bus is a constant target. For purposes of this conversation, understand that our legislative activity comes in the form of lobbying members of Congress to support or oppose a piece of pending legislation. Having myself testified before the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee in July, I fully acknowledge the difference between regulatory and legislative activity.

That is why I am highlighting our work on commenting on pending rules and regulations being considered by federal departments and agencies. Our comments help shape the landscape of pupil transportation in all fleets in the U.S., even if they are far removed from the spotlight of our nation’s Capital.

Last year alone, NSTA sent comments to regulators on 12 separate occasions. For example, we filed comments with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regarding the implementation of Commercial Motor Vehicle ­Automated Driving Systems (ADS).

That particular rulemaking process recognized the vital stake that school transportation has when it comes to the integration of ADS into our school buses. As such, NSTA focused on educating regulators on the importance of other automated vehicles being able to detect the unique stopping patterns of a school bus. We also pointed out that precautions must be taken to ensure automated systems are not vulnerable to cyber security threats. Finally, NSTA stood firm on its position that regardless of the ultimate level of automation a school bus employs, a human “driver” must always be present on a school bus.

NSTA also filed comments with federal regulators in support of reducing Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) testing barriers by allowing drivers to take knowledge tests in another state, as well as supporting the FMCSA’s proposal to increase the “on-duty” hours of service for short-haul commercial drivers (i.e. school bus drivers).

Finally, NSTA submitted other comments to FMCSA supporting their proposal to identify non-preventable crashes on an operator’s Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Category (BASIC) prioritization algorithm and making the Crash Preventability Demonstration Program permanent. We previously submitted comments in July 2015 regarding non-preventable crashes and urged FMCSA to address the issue of crash preventability as it places an undue regulatory burden on carriers, and severely affects their Safety Management System percentile rankings.

John Benish Jr. is the president of the National School Transportation Association.
John Benish Jr. is the president of the National School Transportation Association.

Those involved with pupil transportation know that impeccable safety rankings are not the exception, but rather the standard for school transportation operators. NSTA sought to emphasize to FMCSA that removing non-preventable crashes from a school bus contractor’s ranking was simply an issue of fundamental fairness.

We continue to advance in many ways the interests of school transportation through our advocacy efforts. While you may not see them being boasted about on social media or as a trending story in the news, understand that they have a cumulative impact in supporting private school bus contractors.

Related Topics: contractors, FMCSA, legal issues, NSTA

Comments ( 1 )
  • Randy Merritt

     | about 25 days ago

    Where does the NTSA stand regarding the NTSB recommendation that all School Buses be equipped with Automatic Fire Suppression Systems? Also is the NTSA lobbying for the passage of The School Bus Safety Act of 2019 that is currently “in committee” in both the US House and Senate? Thank you for your proactive comments to promote improved safety for the millions of children riding School Buses every day.

More Stories
Albin J. Weiler, a longtime school bus driver, wrote "Driven to Learn," which details his experiences and those of his fellow drivers and includes pupil transportation tips. Photo courtesy Ron Humphrey, Windjammer Adventure Publishing

Ohio School Bus Driver Publishes Book

“Driven to Learn,” written by Albin J. Weiler, details his experiences and those of his fellow drivers behind the wheel and includes pupil transportation lessons and tips.

The auto-reversing door feature is available on all versions of the Saf-T-Liner C2 (shown here) and allows the front entry doors to reopen automatically if they sense an object or obstruction in the doorway. Photo courtesy Thomas Built Buses

Thomas Built Buses Debuts Auto-Reversing Doors

The feature is available on all versions of the school bus manufacturer’s Saf-T-Liner C2 and allows the front entry doors to reopen automatically if they sense an object or obstruction in the doorway.

HopSkipDrive has raised $22 million to expand its operations, which provide customized transportation service to children. The company has also launched its operations in Las Vegas. Photo courtesy HopSkipDrive

HopSkipDrive Raises $22M, Expands Operations

The funding will be used to expand HopSkipDrive's operations, which provide customized transportation service to children. The company also launches its service in Las Vegas.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has officially extended the compliance deadline for its federal driver training requirement to Feb. 7, 2022. File photo

Update: FMCSA Officially Extends ELDT Compliance Deadline

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration officially delays the deadline for the final rule "Minimum Training Requirements for Entry-Level Commercial Motor Vehicle Operators" from Feb. 7, 2020, to Feb. 7, 2022. The agency released the official notice on Feb. 4.

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!

We respect your data and privacy.
By clicking the submit button below, you are agreeing with Bobit Business Media’s Privacy Policy and this outlined level of consent.