Op-Ed: Going All-Electric May Mean Higher Costs, Emissions

Ezra Finkin
Posted on October 9, 2019

File photo
File photo
There is a compelling economic, air-quality, and common-sense case to be made for investing in new diesel technology to get kids to and from school. New diesel-powered school buses are now a cost-effective, safe, reliable, durable, and near-zero emissions option for all school districts.

Today, 94% of the roughly 500,000 school buses operating in the U.S. are powered by diesel engines. With 1.6 million more kids riding in the newest diesel buses this year — ones outfitted with the cleanest, most fuel-efficient engine technology — diesel clearly remains the fuel of choice for most school districts.

Why is that, particularly when we continually hear about new options like electric and propane?
The answer: diesel provides the best combination of safety, reliability, operating range, durability, low-cost ownership and operation, widely available fueling and repair networks, expanded utility beyond routine routes, and ability to use high-quality renewable biofuels. Additionally, today’s generation of diesel features an important new attribute: near-zero emissions.

Thanks to diesel’s low cost relative to other propulsion options, more emissions can be reduced by replacing older buses with the new generation of diesel buses. On the road since 2010, these buses are equipped with the most advanced emissions-control technology available: diesel particulate filters and selective catalytic reduction systems. These technologies capture nearly all fine particulate matter and eliminate smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions to near-zero levels.

Many school districts have also found they can further lower their carbon footprint and overall emissions by switching from 100% petroleum diesel to blends of advanced, renewable biodiesel fuels. This other low-carbon, greenhouse gas emissions-cutting option does not require additional investments in refueling infrastructure, and can cut carbon emissions by at least 50% overnight. In the case of renewable diesel fuel, the greenhouse gas-eliminating power is over 80%.

Another important consideration is purely economic. Is the high-priced investment in electric school buses — vehicles that only travel a few thousand miles a year, for just a few hours a day, and operated only nine or 10 months a year — a strong case for the use of limited education funding dollars?

Some analysts conclude that all-electric buses may come with a price tag three times that of a new diesel bus. School districts looking to replace older buses frequently operate within very tight budgets. According to the Manteca/Ripon Bulletin, California’s Manteca Unified School District determined that going all-electric would cost almost $4 million more — big money for a small school district — than replacing its aging fleet of 32 buses with new diesel options.

Beyond direct costs, many rural and suburban districts operate in remote areas or in extreme temperature conditions, with established routes that may extend beyond the range capability of a battery. Other school districts may not have the financial wherewithal to invest in a network of expensive charging stations.

The city of Aspen, Colo., determined that the cost of purchasing and installing a single charging station for transit buses came with a $160,000 price tag, according to CleanTechnica. That’s about the cost of another new diesel bus, which amplifies an important point: acquiring electric buses and the requisite infrastructure actually can have the unintended consequence of having more kids riding on older buses, generating higher overall fleet emissions, due to cutbacks on the basic turnover of the existing fleet.

Ezra Finkin is the director of policy for the Diesel Technology Forum.
Ezra Finkin is the director of policy for the Diesel Technology Forum.

For most fleets, choosing the new diesel option may actually reduce emissions because for the same amount of limited pupil transportation dollars, more aging and higher-emitting buses can be replaced at a lower cost than buying a few electric buses. The state of Arizona determined that, for a fixed investment in new school buses, three times as many emissions could be reduced by replacing more aging buses that produce higher emissions with the diesel option than with all-electric buses.

All fuels and technologies have pluses and minuses. Electric buses may have no tailpipe emissions, but the electrons that flow into the buses’ batteries are generated mostly by fossil fuels that produce emissions.

The bottom line: Getting more kids to school safely, affordably, and reliably within the means and budgets of school districts is best done by investing in the latest generation of advanced diesel technology.

Ezra Finkin is the director of policy for the Diesel Technology Forum, which advocates for clean diesel technology. The nonprofit education organization is dedicated to raising awareness about the importance of diesel engines, fuel, and technology. Learn more at www.dieselforum.org.

Related Topics: alternative fuels, diesel, electric bus, emissions

Comments ( 1 )
  • disappointed

     | about 24 days ago

    Love op-eds written by people with vested interests in protecting the fossil fuel industry. Near, zero-emissions doesn't do much for us if we're still clinging to finite and rapidly diminishing resources.

More Stories
The NCST’s Steering Committees and writing committees are preparing for the 2020 Congress. Murrell Martin (shown left) and Bill Loshbough are shown here leading a discussion at NCST 2015.

NCST Gears Up for 2020

The National Congress on School Transportation Steering Committee firms up plans and writing committees are researching requests for procedures manual changes. The Congress will meet in Des Moines, Iowa, in May.

Jed Routh, former logistics manager for Thomas Built Buses, is the manufacturer's new vice president of sales, service, and marketing. He replaces long-time Thomas Built veteran Ken Hedgecock. Photo courtesy Thomas Built Buses

Thomas Built Buses Names New Sales, Marketing VP

Jed Routh, former logistics manager for the manufacturer’s operations team, is the new vice president of sales, service, and marketing. He replaces long-time Thomas Built veteran Ken Hedgecock.

More than 100 attendees joined the federal issues forum with Bruce Landsberg, vice chairman for the National Transportation Safety Board. He went over several of the agency’s safety recommendations, including those for physical performance testing, evacuation training, and fire suppression systems.

PHOTOS: Highlights from NAPT Conference in Columbus

A hands-on team-building exercise, sessions and awards addressing safety and industry achievement, and a trade show showcasing the latest technology were some of the highlights at this year's NAPT conference.

NAPT President Barry Sudduth presented Peter Mannella (right), longtime NAPT member and former executive director of the New York Association for Pupil Transportation, with the association's Distinguished Service Award. 

NAPT Awards Highlight Top-Notch Service, Achievement

Student transportation professionals are recognized for their remarkable dedication and service to the school bus industry. Awards are also presented to Zonar’s 2019 Don Carnahan Memorial grant recipients.

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!