FMCSA withdraws training proposal for commercial vehicle drivers

Kelly Roher
Posted on September 19, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has withdrawn a 2007 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would have required additional training for entry-level operators of commercial vehicles — including school buses — who cross state lines.

Pupil transportation industry officials, including those from the National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation Services (NASDPTS) and the National School Transportation Association (NSTA), had expressed concerns about the proposed rulemaking after it was introduced.

In 2008, NASDPTS said that the rulemaking would significantly increase transportation costs for school districts and exacerbate driver shortages, and the association requested that school bus drivers be exempted from the proposal.

In making its case, NASDPTS cited the superior safety record of the pupil transportation industry, particularly in interstate travel.

“Going back at least 15 years, we can identify only one fatal school bus crash in interstate transportation,” NASDPTS wrote in a comment on the NPRM. “The NPRM does not identify any school bus-specific driver training or interstate safety concerns.”

NSTA also cited the financial impact that the NPRM would have had on the school bus industry in expressing its opposition to the NPRM. The association estimated that the financial impact would have been $88,408,800 in the first year.

In a notice from the FMCSA on Thursday, the agency said that it has withdrawn the proposal “because commenters to the NPRM, and participants in the agency’s 2013 public listening sessions, raised substantive issues which have led the agency to conclude that it would be inappropriate to move forward with a final rule based on the proposal.”  

FMCSA also said that it is conducting two research projects to gather supporting information on the effectiveness of entry-level driver training standards.

The first study will randomly sample CDL holders who received their license in the last three years and were identified as recently employed as a commercial motor vehicle driver using information from the Motor Carrier Management Information System and the Commercial Driver License Information System. The drivers’ safety performance data from these two systems will be analyzed against the type and amount of training they received.   

The second study will gather information from various sources to identify the relationship of training to safety performance. The sources include: carriers; CDL training schools; and state driver’s license agency records. This study will also examine the safety performance of drivers in two states that have regulations dealing with different aspects of CDL driver training.  

A new rulemaking will be based on the results of those studies.

“We are grateful that FMCSA has taken the opportunity for a more thorough research process on this regulation,” NSTA President Tim Flood said. “The financial and procedural consequences of this regulation on the school transportation industry are significant, and a thoughtful approach is in the best interests of all. Safety is without a doubt our top priority, but we must consider every change to current regulations carefully. FMCSA has made the right decision.”

NASDPTS Executive Director Bob Riley added he was “pleased … that FMCSA has responded to our concerns,” and he said that FMCSA has agreed to attend the upcoming NASDPTS conference in Grand Rapids, Mich., to present an update on FMCSA rulemakings and to address its decision-making process regarding the NPRM withdrawal.

The withdrawal notice from the FMCSA is available here.

Related Topics: FMCSA, NASDPTS, NSTA

Comments ( 3 )
  • Dan Luttrell

     | about 5 years ago

    Also: If you really want to improve safety training of school bus drivers then come up with common sense approaches. For example: Drivers usually fall into bad habits; following too closely to avoid an accident, speeding and distracted driving. Inform your drivers up front that you do seek the local law enforcement agencies help. You expect drivers to be reported by phone to your office should they be observed speeding or following too closely along with the possibility of those drivers being pulled over and given traffic tickets. If your drivers cannot police themselves them encourage the police to help you in whatever way possible. In other words - address your local problems - locally. The industry may suffer driver shortages in some areas yet no school system can afford to lower their standards and continue to allow drivers to develop bad driving habits. Really, for the most part, the majority of school bus drivers do an excellant job. You'll always have a few who have bad habits. Weed them out or retrain them with a probationary policy your school system should already have developed. By the way- you only send your best drivers on out-of-state field trips. Why would you not? Dan - Indiana

  • See all comments
More Stories
File photo courtesy Des Moines (Iowa) Public Schools

Fed Mandate for Lap-Shoulder Belts Looks Unlikely

It was no big surprise that NTSB’s latest report calls for lap-shoulder belts on school buses. What was surprising was how the agency decided to direct that recommendation: not to the feds, but to the states.


Flush Mounting Bracket

A new flush mounting bracket from Pro-Vision Systems is designed to allow bus cameras to be mounted recessed into the bulkhead of a school bus or a transit bus.


SOS Alert Device

The Mobile Defender – Model S is a small device that employers can give to employees to use as a panic button during their shifts.

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!