Safety

NAPT News & Views — Promoting, Protecting the School Bus Brand

Mike Martin
Posted on April 22, 2016

Mike Martin is executive director of NAPT.
Mike Martin is executive director of NAPT.
“Branding” is the marketing practice of creating a name, symbol, or design that identifies and differentiates a product.

According to Entrepreneur magazine, “Simply put, your brand is your promise to your customer. It tells them what they can expect from your products and services … derived from who you are, who you want to be and who people perceive you to be.”

NAPT and our partners in the American School Bus Council (ASBC) embrace the yellow school bus as the symbol of our brand. It conjures thoughts of safety and security as well as reliable access to education, all points we consistently emphasize in the public discourse, especially during budget deliberations.

With this in mind, on Feb. 19 nearly 500 students at Cosumnes River Elementary School in Sloughhouse, California, wore yellow Love the Bus T-shirts for our 2016 Love the Bus main event.

The students heard from U.S Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Administrator Jared Blumenfeld, Congressman Ami Bera, and Elk Grove Unified School District Superintendent Chris Hoffman about the importance of being respectful to their bus drivers and appreciating the benefits of school buses. They each highlighted an important benefit of school buses, including safety, reduced traffic congestion, less energy use and air pollution, and assurance that all students have equitable access to educational programs.

This event is the cornerstone of ASBC’s Love the Bus month each February, but it is not the only thing we do to promote our brand. National School Bus Safety Week (NSBSW) is another prominent activity of ours. Last year we asked you to give us feedback on whether we should keep NSBSW in October, or move it to coincide with the back-to-school news cycle in August and September.

Based on your feedback, we’re keeping it in October. But we’ve decided to add a new branding opportunity the third week in August. Currently code-named 3W8, the event is going to be social media-based and easier for you to participate and reach a broader audience. Look for more information in coming months (and send us your thoughts).

We hope the goodwill we create with Love the Bus and NSBSW is not overshadowed by comments directly affecting our brand made by the administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

In a speech at the NAPT Summit last November, NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind announced he was changing the agency’s long-standing policy with regard to lap-shoulder belts in school buses, calling for universal installation and use of this equipment based on his belief that seat belts save lives in all vehicles. In a Feb. 17 follow-up letter to NAPT he said, “I made a clear and unambiguous statement that seat belts save lives, whether in cars or in school buses and that every child riding a school bus should have a three-point seat belt.” He added, “NHTSA will use all of the tools at our disposal to achieve that goal.”

Issues rem
ain that, we believe, work against achieving NHTSA’s goal and have an adverse effect on our brand because they send confusing information to the public we serve.

We appreciate the long overdue recommendation, and urge our members to consider it. However, issues remain that, we believe, work against achieving NHTSA’s goal and have an adverse effect on our brand because they send confusing information to the public we serve.

In addition to several operational questions, there are two NHTSA documents that have the full force and effect of law — a 2011 final rule and a petition denial to groups requesting a mandate for seat belts in school buses — containing statements that conflict with the administrator’s new policy.

For example: “We [NHTSA] determined that it would be inappropriate for NHTSA to require seat belts given the low safety need for the belts, when such a decision has a direct bearing on the ability of the local decision-makers to allocate and spend limited pupil transportation resources on other school transportation safety needs that are likely to garner greater benefits, perhaps at lower cost.”

We urged NHTSA to amend or rescind conflicting statements, and address operational questions.

A recent article in Governing magazine, titled “Despite Lack of Seat Belts, School Bus Fatalities Are Rare,” may capture the current state of play: “Regardless of which set of numbers one parses, it’s clear that serious school bus crashes are very, very rare.”

According to the author, “Despite the drawbacks, NHTSA’s seat belt recommendation represents a possible turning point that’s likely to lead more state legislatures to take up the issue. Given the costs involved and needs in other areas, though, any widespread shift in policy will take time.”

Ultimately, states and school districts will weigh the evidence and decide. At a time when traffic fatalities nationally are spiking (by an average of 9.3%, according to NHTSA) after many decades of declining, we are proud that our safety performance remains constant and the best in the transportation sector.

We believe the best way to maintain excellence for our brand is for safety and other decisions to be made by local professionals based on their assessments of circumstances, resource realities, and best opportunities for benefits. 

Related Topics: Love the Bus, NAPT, seat belts

Comments ( 0 )
More Stories

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!