School Bus Contractors

NSTA Advocacy in Action — CSA Score Viability and Usage

Ronna Weber
Posted on March 28, 2016

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) introduced the Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) program in December 2010 to provide a comprehensive system to measure motor carrier safety.

Through its use of seven basics, the CSA program scores each motor carrier’s safety performance. The scores are then made available to the public, which is encouraged to use this tool to guide their choice when selecting a transportation provider.

Conceptually, no one can argue the intent of this system. The problem, however, is that some of the key methodologies and structural elements of CSA are misaligned and, even more troubling, can misrepresent a carrier’s safety performance.

The National School Transportation Association (NSTA) has long advocated that the current peer grouping method should be re-evaluated. Currently, motor carriers are rated against their like-size peers, but all vehicles are combined in the measurement, meaning passenger carriers are evaluated against freight vehicles. Truly measuring a carrier against its peers would only measure passenger carriers against passenger carriers and freight vehicles against freight vehicles.

In addition, NSTA has expressed concern over the crash data. NSTA has advocated for the use of crash rates per million miles, as this is a better indicator of safety performance than is currently utilized. We have also encouraged the incorporation of “contributing factor” data from police reports in order to exempt non-preventable crashes from being included in the scoring.

Most importantly, NSTA has objected to the public posting of scores and accident information without easily understood context to enable a consumer to interpret the data. As currently portrayed, consumers are very likely to reach erroneous conclusions about carriers’ safety records.

According to NSTA, truly measuring a carrier against its peers would only measure passenger carriers against passenger carriers and freight vehicles against freight vehicles.
According to NSTA, truly measuring a carrier against its peers would only measure passenger carriers against passenger carriers and freight vehicles against freight vehicles.
FMCSA has resisted all three recommendations along with a wide range of additional suggestions to address the issues and problems with CSA from its own Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee, the Government Accountability Office and a number of safety advocates.

NSTA, along with other industry groups of bus and truck operators, went to Congress to seek relief. Fortunately, Congress responded to our collective concerns and included a significant provision in the recently passed Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act that requires FMCSA to revise the foundational methodology of the program and address deficiencies in peer grouping and crash data.

The law is very prescriptive and requires significant levels of oversight by the National Academy of Sciences, the inspector general of the Department of Transportation and Congress to ensure that FMCSA achieves the requirements. Most importantly, the law requires the removal of most publicly visible information related to commercial motor vehicle operator compliance and safety performance while the program is being revised. All scores and accident data would continue to be available to enforcement officials.

The bill specified that carrier safety information for “motorcoach operations” should continue to remain visible, but a caveat statement must be included noting that unless the carrier has an unsatisfactory rating, the carrier is approved to travel on the nation’s roadways.

Following the passage of the FAST Act, FMCSA removed property carriers’ scores from public view. However, school bus operators’ scores have remained publicly visible with the same caveat required for motorcoach operations. When asked why school bus operator scores are still visible, FMCSA responded that they interpreted the exception to apply to all passenger carriers, not just motorcoach operators. NSTA believes this interpretation is in violation of the FAST Act, and the association is exploring next steps.

NSTA has always supported, and will continue to support, a system to assess school bus carriers’ safety and potential crash risk, but the system must fairly and equitably depict a carrier’s safety performance while providing easy-to-understand information for consumers.

Related Topics: FMCSA, NSTA

Comments ( 1 )
  • crystal

     | about 3 years ago

    Hi, property motor carrier scores are viewable again, just no % and no scary (!) warning signs shown to public.

More Stories
VAT runs a fleet of 80 school buses in Ohio.

Contractors Connect on Recruiting Strategies, Fuel Outlook

Four school bus operators from four states find common ground in dealing with driver shortage, tapping into the benefits of GPS and video cameras, and assessing fuel options. For the most part, they’re sticking with diesel for now, but one is seeing success with an electric bus.

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!