Safety

The debate on traffic monitoring systems

Frank Di Giacomo
Posted on August 9, 2011

In the long-running battle against the illegal passing of school buses, one of the more recent developments is the use of cameras to catch violators.

These types of surveillance systems — which are typically mounted on the outside of the bus near the stop arm — have been around for several years now, but some states haven’t approved their use. However, this year there has been a wave of legislation in support of exterior school bus cameras.

In Connecticut, a law change that went into effect in July lets video surveillance footage be used against motorists who illegally pass stopped school buses.

The amended law requires that warning signs are posted on buses equipped with surveillance systems to catch the stop-arm violations. An image that clearly shows the license plate number of a passing vehicle is considered sufficient proof of the identity of the vehicle.

In Virginia, legislation that became effective in July authorizes localities to allow local school divisions to install surveillance systems on their buses to detect drivers passing illegally.

In New York, the state Assembly passed a bill that would approve the use of photographic evidence to prosecute illegal passers. That bill and other pieces of state legislation that have been introduced this year aim to crack down on stop-arm running in various ways, including raising penalties.

The New York Association for Pupil Transportation has run demonstration projects using a related type of technology: a digital license reader. The association says that the results supported its estimate that there are more than 50,000 instances of illegal school bus passing in the state every school day.

Stop-arm surveillance systems certainly show potential in catching and deterring these dangerous violations. But as the cameras’ use becomes more widespread and draws more attention, might they be faced with public resistance and legal challenges?

That notion came to mind upon hearing of the Los Angeles City Council’s debate on whether to end the city’s contentious red-light camera program, which has units installed on 32 traffic signals.

As of our press time, the Los Angeles Times had reported that the council was deadlocked, with the deliberations expected to continue for weeks.

Yet a new survey from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety indicates that two-thirds of drivers in 14 big cities with longstanding red-light camera programs support their use. That finding follows a study by the institute that found that these cameras have reduced the rate of fatal red-light running crashes by 24 percent in these same cities.

Similarly, new research from the University of Missouri confronts the claims of many drivers that city governments install automated traffic monitoring systems as a way to generate revenue. According to the researchers, the safety benefits of the systems (school bus cameras were not part of the study) “far outweigh the potential for abuse.”

Any drivers who are worried about being photographed and fined, whether at a traffic light or next to a school bus, should shift their focus to following the laws. Then they can smile for the cameras — they have nothing to worry about.

Related Topics: stop-arm running/illegal passing, video surveillance

Comments ( 1 )
  • Elizabeth Sawning

     | about 6 years ago

    I have noticed over the last few years the number of drivers that deliberately drive through my red flashing lights, stop sign and crossing arm has increased 1000x. The see the lights and just drive through them anyway. I feel that a concentrated campaign starting late august to remind drivers of state laws and consequences with a extreme increase in penalties would decrease the number of drivers who pass our red lights as well as using the outside camaras to catch the offenders

More Stories
News

Mother Gets Probation for Assaulting School Bus Driver

Kiesha Shannon of Ohio pleads guilty to attacking her daughter’s bus driver and is sentenced to three years of probation. The judge says he had limited sentencing options, which is why he didn’t give her jail time.

Product

Portable Child Restraint

HSM Transportation Solutions’ C.E. White Portable Child Restraint for school buses, a five-point restraint system, is designed to accommodate children weighing 20 to 90 pounds and up to 57 inches in height.

Product

2-Camera System

The DS2 is a two-camera vehicle event recording system that combines high-definition video recording, fleet telematics, and vehicle operating data on one screen for better incident review and driver coaching.

As Maryland’s new state director of pupil transportation, Gabriel Rose (seen here) replaces Leon Langley, who stepped down from the position in July.
News

New State Director Named in Maryland

Gabriel Rose, who previously served as a security specialist for Talbot County (Md.) Public Schools, replaces Leon Langley as state director.

According to new research from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, drivers who miss one to two hours of the recommended seven hours of sleep nearly double their risk for a crash.
Article

Don't Skimp on Safety Sleep

According to new research from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, drivers who miss one to two hours of the recommended seven hours of sleep nearly double their risk for a crash.

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!