School Bus Contractors

N.Y. transit encroachment ruling upheld

Posted on September 1, 2007

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — On July 30, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) notified the Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority (RGRTA) that the agency must discontinue its routes that serve the Rochester City School District (RCSD) before the beginning of the 2007-08 school year.

The notification reaffirms the FTA’s original decision — which was made in January 2007 — that the RGRTA was illegally engaged in school bus operations, which stemmed from a complaint against the RGRTA last year.

In June 2006, the United Food & Commercial Workers District Local One alleged that the agency’s provision of service pursuant to a subsidy agreement with the Rochester City School District was a violation of the FTA’s school bus regulations, which seek to prevent federally funded transit bus operations from competing with private school bus operations.

In April 2007, the FTA reopened the case. The National School Transportation Association (NSTA) brought the matter to the attention of several congressmen, who wrote to FTA Administrator James Simpson expressing their concern with the agency’s action.

In addition to issuing the cease-and-desist order, the FTA notified the RGRTA that as a penalty it would withhold federal funding in an amount related to the subsidies that RGRTA received from the school district.

In her decision, FTA Regional Administrator Brigid Hynes-Cherin said the RGRTA operated more than 100 routes that constituted illegal school bus service and caused “a massive displacement” of the local contractor’s business. She estimated that the transit agency would have received more than $7 million in subsidy from the school district for the upcoming school year.

Hynes-Cherin said the routes in question were designed for school district students and only incidentally served the general public. She cited one purported tripper route that “starts in a neighborhood, joins a regular public transportation route for a brief period but then goes without stops to the school destination for the last 10 to 15 minutes.” Typical RGRTA routes, Hynes-Cherin said, have bus stops every two or three minutes.

The FTA also pointed to the fact that the RGRTA admitted creating three of its routes at the behest of the school district.

“RGRTA further explained that this service would be discontinued [as] soon as RCSD no longer desired it and that RCSD would not be receiving a state subsidy for these routes because the routes serve children that live under 1.5 miles from their school,” Hynes-Cherin wrote in her decision.

“We hope that this decision is going to help us going forward when other violations occur,” said Robin Leeds, NSTA’s government relations liaison.


Related Topics: FTA, NSTA, transit/tripper service

Comments ( 0 )
More Stories
File photo by John Horton

5 New Tools to Benefit Contractors

This year, the National School Transportation Association has added resources, features, and member benefits that provide new, unique, and unsurpassed value for its members.

VAT runs a fleet of 80 school buses in Ohio.

Contractors Connect on Recruiting Strategies, Fuel Outlook

Four school bus operators from four states find common ground in dealing with driver shortage, tapping into the benefits of GPS and video cameras, and assessing fuel options. For the most part, they’re sticking with diesel for now, but one is seeing success with an electric bus.

Be the First to Know

Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!