Safety

Momentum shifts away from non-conforming vans

Frank Di Giacomo, Publisher
Posted on August 1, 1999

As we approach the end of the 20th century, I’m encouraged by a school transportation safety development that seems to be gaining momentum at a national, state and local level. What I’m referring to is the decision by many school districts, private schools, day-care centers and Head Start agencies to replace their non-conforming vans with school buses. Manufacturers of small school buses tell me that sales of these units are up, way up. That’s good news for an industry that stakes its reputation on safety. It’s also a sensible, fiscally sound move for any organization transporting children to school or school-related activities. Although school buses may cost more than passenger vans, they are built for longer life. Over the long haul, they are the cost-effective choice. Yes, I know. Passenger vans have the advantage of not necessarily requiring that the driver hold a CDL. This allows teachers, coaches and other school personnel to drive them, whereas school buses require a certified school bus driver to be at the wheel. This circumstance seems to favor the van as the more economical alternative. This is a misleading advantage. Although the services of a school bus driver may be more expensive than, say, a volunteer coach’s, the school bus driver — driving a school bus — is more likely to avoid an accident, particularly one that involves injuries. This keeps a district or contractor’s risk management costs down.

Safety is the bottom line
Of course, the most important consideration is safety. School buses provide children with the highest level of protection. It’s an added benefit that their use also protects school operators from the sky-high liability exposure that comes with operating non-conforming vans. This transition to the school bus should be helped along by a recent report and safety recommendation by the National Transportation Safety Board. The safety board studied four accidents involving non-conforming buses and, on the basis of its findings, urged governors of the 50 states and the District of Columbia to require that all vehicles carrying more than 10 passengers and transporting children to and from school and school-related activities meet school bus structural standards.

Tragedies tell the story
For those of you who haven’t read the NTSB report, here’s a brief summary of the crashes. You might want to share these with anyone you know who’s still operating non-conforming vans.

  • March 25, 1998. In Sweetwater, Fla., a 15-passenger van hired by parents to take children to and from school collided with a transit bus. Three children were ejected and sustained head injuries.
  • March 26, 1998. In Lenoir City, Tenn., a 25-passenger specialty bus taking children from a school-related activity collided with a truck-tractor semitrailer. Two people, one of whom was ejected, were fatally injured.
  • Dec. 8, 1998. In East Dublin, Ga., a 15-passenger van transporting children to a Head Start program collided with a pickup truck. One child was ejected and fatally injured.
  • Feb. 16, 1999. In Bennettsville, S.C., a 15-passenger van transporting children home from an after-school church program was struck by a tow truck. Three children were ejected, and a total of six children were fatally injured. These accidents speak for themselves. Unfortunately, the nine people killed in the crashes can’t do the same. If you don’t already know, find out if your state allows the use of non-conforming buses to transport children to and from school or school-related activities. If so, let your lawmakers know that this situation is neither wise nor financially sound.
  • Related Topics: non-conforming vans

    Comments ( 0 )
    More Stories
    News

    Mother Gets Probation for Assaulting School Bus Driver

    Kiesha Shannon of Ohio pleads guilty to attacking her daughter’s bus driver and is sentenced to three years of probation. The judge says he had limited sentencing options, which is why he didn’t give her jail time.

    Product

    Portable Child Restraint

    HSM Transportation Solutions’ C.E. White Portable Child Restraint for school buses, a five-point restraint system, is designed to accommodate children weighing 20 to 90 pounds and up to 57 inches in height.

    Product

    2-Camera System

    The DS2 is a two-camera vehicle event recording system that combines high-definition video recording, fleet telematics, and vehicle operating data on one screen for better incident review and driver coaching.

    As Maryland’s new state director of pupil transportation, Gabriel Rose (seen here) replaces Leon Langley, who stepped down from the position in July.
    News

    New State Director Named in Maryland

    Gabriel Rose, who previously served as a security specialist for Talbot County (Md.) Public Schools, replaces Leon Langley as state director.

    According to new research from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, drivers who miss one to two hours of the recommended seven hours of sleep nearly double their risk for a crash.
    Article

    Don't Skimp on Safety Sleep

    According to new research from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, drivers who miss one to two hours of the recommended seven hours of sleep nearly double their risk for a crash.

    In the wake of the Nov. 21 fatal crash in Chattanooga, Tennessee, state lawmakers have introduced several bills that take aim at school bus safety. Photo courtesy Chattanooga Fire Department
    News

    Tennessee Legislators Target School Bus Safety

    One bill would require seat belts on school buses in Tennessee. Other proposals aim to raise the state’s minimum age for school bus drivers and increase oversight of pupil transportation.

    Be the First to Know

    Get the latest news and most popular articles from SBF delivered straight to your inbox. Stay on top of the school bus industry and don't miss a thing!