Subscribe Today

March 01, 2007  |   Comments (0)   |   Post a comment

NAPT calls for review of safety standards


SHARING TOOLS   | Email Print RSS

ALBANY, N.Y. — The National Association for Pupil Transportation’s (NAPT) board of directors petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to review key school bus safety standards and to elaborate on lap/shoulder belts.

In a 2002 report to Congress on school bus safety, NHTSA said that it was considering the following changes to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 222, which covers school bus passenger seating and crash protection:

 

  • Increase seat back height from 20 to 24 inches to reduce the potential for passenger override in the event of a crash.

     

  • Require buses under 10,000 pounds to have lap/shoulder restraints. Currently, passenger seats on these buses are only required to be equipped with lap belts.

     

  • Develop standardized test procedures for voluntarily installed lap-shoulder belts.

    The NAPT’s petition asks NHTSA to initiate rulemakings on those items to determine whether upgrading FMVSS 222 could make school buses safer.

    In a separate statement, the NAPT said that it would sponsor an industry-wide forum to discuss any changes that NHTSA proposes.

    The NAPT also requested clarification of statements that NHTSA made about lap/shoulder belt systems in the report to Congress. NHTSA had indicated that lap-shoulder belt systems, if used properly, could save one life a year. However, NHTSA noted that this estimate relied on 100 percent usage and no misuse of the systems.

    The NAPT wrote in its petition that those usage parameters are “virtually impossible.” Further complicating the matter was NHTSA’s finding that misuse could result in serious neck and abdominal injuries.

    “We were expecting NHTSA to tell us whether or not lap/shoulder belts should be integrated into the passenger crash protection system of school buses,” said NAPT Executive Director Mike Martin. “We, like everyone else, were disappointed that we didn’t get a definitive answer. Whether NHTSA was unable or unwilling to settle the matter is, at this point, irrelevant; the outcome is the same in either case — everyone who wanted and needed a clear answer to that question is currently frustrated and perplexed.”

    In the petition, the NAPT said that it interprets NHTSA’s statements about lap/shoulder belts to mean that the current system of passenger crash protection in school buses, compartmentalization, continues to be the best approach.

    “We know that NHTSA considers a yellow school bus the safest form of ground transportation in America — even without seat belts,” said NAPT President Lenny Bernstein. “As a result, we believe modifications to the current system of school bus passenger crash protection should only occur when we can be sure beyond a reasonable doubt that those modifications will improve the safety of each and every child in a school bus.”

    The NAPT also called on NHTSA to help in educating the public about how school buses differ from cars from a crashworthiness perspective and about the key role that school bus transportation plays in saving lives.

    The petition and other related documents are available on the NAPT Website, www.napt.org, in the “Industry News” section.

     


  • Post a Comment

    Read more about: NAPT, NHTSA, seat belts

    Request More Info about this product/service/company

    Post a comment





    Related Stories

    Premium Member

    Get bus sales numbers, transportation statistics, bus specifications, industry survey results, bus loading and unloading fatality statistics and more in the School Bus Fleet Research Center. Become a premium member today!
    Log in Button Register Button

    Newsletter

    Get breaking news, industry updates, product announcements and more.