Subscribe Today

February 09, 2012  |   Comments (3)   |   Post a comment

Contracted Pa. bus drivers still eligible for jobless benefits

By Kelly Roher


SHARING TOOLS   | Email Print RSS
A bill that would have affected contracted school bus drivers' ability to collect unemployment benefits died in the Pennsylvania General Assembly after its sponsor withdrew his name from the legislation.Photo by Wikipedia user Niagara

A bill that would have affected contracted school bus drivers' ability to collect unemployment benefits died in the Pennsylvania General Assembly after its sponsor withdrew his name from the legislation.
Photo by Wikipedia user Niagara

HARRISBURG, Pa. — Legislation that would have affected the ability of school bus drivers working for private contractors to collect unemployment benefits has died in the state's General Assembly, as the bill’s prime sponsor has withdrawn his name from it.

House Bill (HB) 128 would have amended the state’s unemployment compensation law to eliminate the eligibility for school bus drivers working for bus companies to get such benefits over the summer break in between school years.

According to the Pennsylvania School Bus Association (PSBA), Rep. Dan Moul introduced the bill in the General Assembly on behalf of a contractor in his district. Moul reportedly believed that allowing school bus drivers who are employed by contractors to collect unemployment benefits during summer breaks inflates contractors’ operating costs and, therefore, inflates the costs that school districts incur in transporting their students.

The bill was last referred to the labor and industry committee in October. Upon learning of the legislation, the PSBA monitored all legislation that pertained to unemployment compensation to ensure that language from HB 128 would not be included.

The association also voiced its opposition to the bill.

“We discussed the legislation within our legislative committee and did have conversation with the representative about the negative impact it could have for private contractors,” PSBA Executive Director Selina Pittenger told SBF. “Some PSBA members outside of the legislative committee did hear about the legislation, either through local media or other rumors, and contacted the PSBA office about it. PSBA members who inquired about the legislation were encouraged to contact their legislator and relay information about the impact such legislation would have on their business and contracts.”

The association’s legislative committee also began to develop a position paper on the issue that was to be distributed to PSBA members for a grassroots lobbying effort against the bill, but Moul withdrew his name from it before the paper was finished. 

“We are very happy that this bill is not going to move out of committee,” Pittenger said. “If it would have passed the General Assembly and been signed by the governor, it would have cost contractors and school districts much more. The sponsoring legislator proposed HB 128 because he believed that it would ultimately save school district transportation costs. PSBA speculated that many drivers would not return the next school year. This would further contribute to the driver shortages.”

Pittenger added that by her estimation, it costs approximately $1,000 per new driver to get them trained and qualified in Pennsylvania. Moreover, on average, the school bus industry in the state experiences an approximately 20 percent driver turnover rate, so if HB 128 had become law, she believes that rate would have most likely increased two-fold, if not more.

Pittenger also noted that the PSBA will continue to monitor legislation relating to unemployment compensation for any similar language that could be introduced by a legislator in the future.


Post a Comment

Read more about: Pennsylvania


I work for a school district as a bus driver. This year the district did not give the drivers the customary promissory agreement for a position next year. Does this mean I am not promised a job and I can draw unemplyment benefits until I receive such a letter.

Bill    |    Jun 06, 2012 03:18 PM

well if the pay was enough to go 12 months and feed us then if unemployment would be the way to go. But our daily income gross is $62.00 average a day now times that by 180 that is $11,160 divide that by 12 now that is $930 a month divide that by 4 that comes out to $232.50 GROSS weekly go ahead live off of that I could not so now my Job would not be a school bus driver. It is like they want us to be like teachers that's fine but give us a comparable salary and benefit package they can't. So this kinda makes up for it. We are out of work when you think of it and you have no work for us so what dose that spell out Unemployment. If you want to save money in the school district try looking and comparing salary of 5 bus driver to on Assistance principal and what do they really do?

sue    |    Feb 09, 2012 04:05 PM

I have driven school bus for many years and found that the easiest way to have income for summer is to ask for a 12 month contract instead of a 10 month contract. My pay is the same as if it was for only 10 months. They just divide the contract into 12 month payments. Paychecks are a little smaller but doable. If I end up doing extra driving in the summer, that goes on another paycheck. That way, I am guaranteed a summer paycheck. If all school districts would do this, not one driver would need to try to get unemployment benefits, saving the school money.

LaNae    |    Feb 09, 2012 11:42 AM

Post a comment





Related Stories

Premium Member

Get bus sales numbers, transportation statistics, bus specifications, industry survey results, bus loading and unloading fatality statistics and more in the School Bus Fleet Research Center. Become a premium member today!
Log in Button Register Button

Newsletter

Get breaking news, industry updates, product announcements and more.